VIDEO: BMW M3 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs Mercedes-AMG C63 S Part 2

BMW M3 | July 19th, 2017 by 5
bmw m3 with competition package and ferrari red paint 2 750x500

DriveTribe previously put the BMW M3 Competition Package, Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio and Mercedes-AMG C63 S to the test in a drag race to see …

DriveTribe previously put the BMW M3 Competition Package, Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio and Mercedes-AMG C63 S to the test in a drag race to see which was fastest. They deemed the Mercedes-AMG the winner of that drag race, even though the Alfa seemed like the fastest car most of the time, thanks to its quickest run to 150 mph. But that was only part one of the comparison test for these three cars. Part two was to be a track battle, to see which car was fastest at Anglesey.

In this latest video, that’s exactly what we see. These three cars get lapped around Anglesey as fast as they can go to see which is the best track weapon. All three cars were flogged by Jethro Bovington, who properly pushes these cars to their limits. So which is the fastest?

2017 alfa romeo giulia 006 1 750x500

Well, the Alfa goes first, so the newcomer can try and set the standard. It’s a bit squirrelly around the track, as it wants to oversteer everywhere and it isn’t the most controllable car in the world. It’s fast, very fun and very exciting but you can just see it losing speed, as it pushes its tail wide. Its brakes are also a bit odd and the pedal feel isn’t the best. But it’s a fun car to drive and it has a brilliant engine. The Alfa set a lap time of 1:41.55. So let’s see if the BMW M3 can do any better.

After the Alfa, the M3 takes its lap. Immediately, you can see the difference in the two cars from Bovington’s view. The M3 has some initial understeer, which the Alfa didn’t seem to have, but it transitions to oversteer on throttle really nicely and can just be pushed right to the edge of the apex. It seems like a far more balanced and neutral car than the Alfa. It will oversteer as well, as we know the current M3 to do, but it’s more progressive and more controllable. It has a lot of balance. Its brakes are also better than the Alfa’s. Its engine isn’t quite as sweet but it’s powerful and works well. But one of the real benefits of the BMW M3 is its DCT gearbox, which is snappier, easier to use and better geared for track use. The M3 set a blistering time of 1:40.16.

2015 mercedes benz c63 amg HD 750x422

After the rapid lap of the BMW M3, the Mercedes-AMG C63 S tries to beat it. Its monster V8 power is capable of overcoming its weight, as we saw in the drag race, but that weight can become an issue on the track. The AMG oversteers quite a lot but it’s more fun to drive than the Alfa. It’s more neutral and more progressive than the Italian but wilder and crazier than the BMW. It’s a good middle-man between both cars. Its steering is good and its balance is impressive for such a heavy car. Though, it’s let down but its transmission, which you need to time well or you’ll bounce off the rev limiter and slow yourself down. In the end, the AMG crossed the line in 1:41.73.

So the AMG was the slowest car in the test, with the Alfa in the middle and the BMW M3 as the fastest. It’s a decisive victory for the BMW M3, where it shows off its motorsport pedigree well. Next video will determine which car is the most fun by hooning them around the track, stopwatch be damned.

5 responses to “VIDEO: BMW M3 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs Mercedes-AMG C63 S Part 2”

  1. bmw driver says:

    Oh no… here they come again… it’s a plot against the Alfa! When it isn’t being made to break down (by almost every motor press outfit it seems) it’s being driven with 300kg of sand in the trunk, or in comfort mode, or they switched drives to Jethro’s grandma. None of the Alfisti will comment on how the Alfa has trofeo tires.

    Looks like that Nurburgring time was indeed bullshit. A massive, shameful lie by Alfa to lift pre-orders of their poorly built comeback car. Imagine if they’d spent the money they wasted on their fake lap time on more quality assurance for the Giulia instead.

    On the plus side, apparently a manual M2, in the hands of the same driver, on the same track, is almost as quick as an M3 CP with ceramic brakes. Clearly the F87 chassis is one of BMWs best ever. The question now is how hard will BMW have to nerf the M2 GTS to make it slower than the M4 GTS.

    • To be fair to the Alfa, it is faster than the M3 but it’s harder to control. Maybe someone with a much bigger pair than I have could have actually done that Ring lap time. Also, I’m pretty sure the Alfa has Corsas not Trofeos. Just tested one (review coming!) and it had corsas as well.

      • bmw driver says:

        It is faster in a straight line, but there is no way in hell it is faster than an M4GTS on the ring, which is the BS time that Alfa did in a supposed production car. That right there was, and is, just bullshit. Alfas are subject to physics as well.

        The Alfa is allegedly 13 seconds (!) faster than the regular M4 on the ‘ring, it’s a tough argument to explain why it ends up being barely faster than a C63 on any track, with the same driver, without accepting the manufacturer lied and sent a stripped out, heavily modified, non production car around and pretended it was legit.

        I happen to like the Alfa, but they should have focused on quality and let the car speak for itself, it looks stunning and it sounds way better than the dreadful farty mess S55. Even if it isn’t faster than the M3, why worry? Just make sure it’s built well and reliable. Did yours break down in testing as well, or did you guys get a good one? Looking forward to reading the review.

  2. Fred Smith says:

    We all know the legs of the V8 will rule in straight line speed. The merc is heavy hence slower cornering ability around the track.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

NEWSLETTER