VIDEO: BMW M5 vs Mercedes-AMG E63 S — Auto Express Track Battle

BMW M5, Videos | April 19th, 2018 by 13
BMW M5 Snapper Rocks Blue images 25 830x553

Very recently, Auto Express pit the new BMW M5 against the Mercedes-AMG E63 S against each other in a drift battle. In the end, they …

Very recently, Auto Express pit the new BMW M5 against the Mercedes-AMG E63 S against each other in a drift battle. In the end, they decided that both were absurdly good drift cars but that the M5 might just be a bit sweeter. Now, though, AE is back with both of these cars and has decided to see which is quicker around the track.

At Llandow Circuit, Steve Sutcliffe does a couple of warm up laps in each car, telling us a bit about how they drive. Then he does a flying lap in each car to see which is quicker. And the results are crazy close.

The BMW M5 is the newer car of the two and packs a 4.4 liter twin-turbocharged V8 engine that makes 600 hp and 553 lb-ft of torque. It uses an eight-speed automatic gearbox and all-wheel drive with a rear-wheel drive mode. According to BMW, it can get from 0-60 mph in 3.2 seconds but we’ve seen it do that in 2.8 seconds with a proper launch. So it’s seriously quick.

BMW M5 Snapper Rocks Blue images 27 830x554

While the Mercedes-AMG E63 S is a bit older and uses a smaller but more powerful engine. Its 4.0 liter twin-turbo V8 makes 603 hp and 627 lb-ft of torque is quite a bit punchier than the M5’s engine on paper, although we’ve seen dyno tests that show the M5 making more. The same could also likely be said about the AMG, though. It also uses an automatic gearbox, a nine-speed Mercedes-made unit, and an all-wheel drive system with a rear-wheel drive mode. According to mercedes, it can hit 60 mph in 3.3 seconds, so it’s a touch slower than the M5 on paper but that doesn’t always accurately translate to the real world.

The BMW M5 goes first and Sutcliffe seems to really like it a lot. Even in its 4WD Sport mode, it still likes to kick its tail out and it’s a proper hooligan. It’s also really flipping fast. Its puts down a flying lap of 44.7 seconds, which is damn quick for a two-ton sedan around Llandow.

After that, the AMG goes for its laps and Sutcliffe claims that it’s a proper hotrod. Its monster engine, accompanied by its incredible soundtrack, is a masterpiece. The gas pedal feels more like the detonator of a small warhead. But its also heavier, so can it put down a faster time than the M5? Yes. By one tenth. Sutcliffe was able to run a 44.6 second time. So these two are astonishingly close.

mercedes e63 amg 38 1 750x422

It should also be noted that the BMW M5 was wearing Pirelli P Zero tires while the AMG sported Michelin PS4S tires. The latter of which are significantly stickier and could have played a part in the AMG winning. That’s not excuse making but it was something that was pointed out, quite passionately, in their comment sections. So it’s something that needs to be noted. Having said that, both cars are incredibly fast and they both show how far the industry has come. These two-ton luxury sedans have supercar-level power and put down genuine sports car lap times, while also being comfortable, high-tech, spacious, luxurious and, more importantly, fun to drive. There’s no question, these two are the best sedans on the planet. Which is better seems to be more personal preference.

13 responses to “VIDEO: BMW M5 vs Mercedes-AMG E63 S — Auto Express Track Battle”

  1. mod9 says:

    Why do these reviewers always have to have something that will make people think about the “what ifs”.

    Just do the review with the same tyres already so that nobody will have an excuse.

    In any case, I have already made my choice a long time ago, M5 for me till the next one comes along.

    • Frankie G says:

      Agreed, but a majority of the UK press cars were supplied on Pirelli P Zero’s as is so it makes sense to test them…..as is.

    • DM says:

      It’s also a constant game of one-up-manship as the Benz is the AMG E63 “S” which means that the proper equivalent should have been the M5 Competition Package.

      But I suppose that will be a future comparison – more content for the journalists to ply their trade.

    • B3ernd says:

      its not auto express fault. bmw just gave the car and bmw knew that they will do a test vs. e63 S. Auto Express cant change tires by themselves. dont blame the Magazines.

  2. PK says:

    ok i admit. they’re both superior in their own way. it’s a toss up now between the two cars.

  3. Donald Dong says:

    Not only did most reviewers test the wrong the tires, they also test the wrong models. the AMG E63S is a equivalent to the M5 Competition pack, so why not test the AMG E63 and put the same tires on the M5. Reviewers are quite ridiculous nowadays, they do whatever necessary to make people click on the article

    • Philip says:

      Not true, S is just all wheel drive, the only version in USA. It wouldn’t be fair to import the rear drive only non S to do comparison. Black series would be good match for comp package.

    • B3ernd says:

      those are some hard excuses. they tested AWD Cars. the e63 is in most countries just rwd with less Power. You have to choose AWD vs. AWD. There is a 12hp gap wich is nothing compared to the weight advantage of M5. M5 vs. E63S is a perfekt match when you consider the age advantage of M5.

      Both are great and none of them belong on a racetrack. around 2t with driver is just a brick in corners ;)

      • Donald Dong says:

        Well to be fair, BMW doesn’t seem to make bang it all out M firepower with Mercedes and Audi. AMG and Audi have decrease their displacement to 4 litre while upping per litre metrics, BMW seems want to utilize the original S63, since the car is already good enough, they probably will introduce a new 4.0 later, so what we see here is not direct competition, is the overall package, and the new M5 chassis mated very well with the 4.4 V8, they don’t even need a new engine to get those speed, but I will prefer BMW M to up its horsepower per litre game with the two German rivals, and that should be very entertaining, the M5 should go from ridiculously fast to a rocket.

  4. Giom says:

    … Yea, well, the poor Merc still have to live with that ridiculous body design. Unbelievable!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

NEWSLETTER