<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E60/E61 5-Series: Thank You, BMW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/</link>
	<description>BMW News, Reviews, Test Drives, Photos And Videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-171031</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-171031</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really know what was so Bangle about this design. I think it looks fantastic and I really can&#039;t see the Bangle in it. To me it&#039;s just a very nicely designed BMW. the Bangle I can see in the old 7 series...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really know what was so Bangle about this design. I think it looks fantastic and I really can&#8217;t see the Bangle in it. To me it&#8217;s just a very nicely designed BMW. the Bangle I can see in the old 7 series&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve from Oz</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-171012</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve from Oz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-171012</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a proud E60 PRO SPORT owner as well, It&#039;s definitely the best car that I have ever owned I couldn&#039;t be happier &amp; I also absolutely love the Bangle design there is nothing on the road like it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a proud E60 PRO SPORT owner as well, It&#8217;s definitely the best car that I have ever owned I couldn&#8217;t be happier &amp; I also absolutely love the Bangle design there is nothing on the road like it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travelgeek</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-169979</link>
		<dc:creator>travelgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-169979</guid>
		<description>I had 3 of them as lease company cars. It was a huge jump from the predecessor. I remember that I was not too much impressed from the exterior but from the interior. 

Also the driving experience was a big step up. It was a very different, modern car. It influenced the design language and set the standard for years to come. It still does not look old after all, still fresh and modern.

My last E60 was with a M package - and I also liked the exterior</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had 3 of them as lease company cars. It was a huge jump from the predecessor. I remember that I was not too much impressed from the exterior but from the interior. </p>
<p>Also the driving experience was a big step up. It was a very different, modern car. It influenced the design language and set the standard for years to come. It still does not look old after all, still fresh and modern.</p>
<p>My last E60 was with a M package &#8211; and I also liked the exterior</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiberiu</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-169610</link>
		<dc:creator>tiberiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-169610</guid>
		<description>Thank you BMW for my E60! Is a really great car! Zero problems in 120kkm! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you BMW for my E60! Is a really great car! Zero problems in 120kkm! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jp Albano</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-169198</link>
		<dc:creator>Jp Albano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-169198</guid>
		<description>Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jp Albano</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-169197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jp Albano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-169197</guid>
		<description>Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ezh</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-169082</link>
		<dc:creator>ezh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-169082</guid>
		<description>M5 never did 4.1. I read 4.5 was the case, but I managed to throw out of my M5 with all available options (in 2006) only 5.0 to 100. Maybe I should made some more practice, but my feeling says that 4.7 was the max, with new tyres (there some spin on used one).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M5 never did 4.1. I read 4.5 was the case, but I managed to throw out of my M5 with all available options (in 2006) only 5.0 to 100. Maybe I should made some more practice, but my feeling says that 4.7 was the max, with new tyres (there some spin on used one).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L1ndja</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-169070</link>
		<dc:creator>L1ndja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-169070</guid>
		<description>Great great article.It really is a bmw fan boy article and it pays great respect to one if not the best car ever built.
I remember seeing it for the first time,i think it was love at first time,it really was one of a kind..
Lets hope bmw continues its tradition and that the F10 can step in to the footsteps of the King of midsize luxury sedans.
Long live the E60.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great great article.It really is a bmw fan boy article and it pays great respect to one if not the best car ever built.<br />
I remember seeing it for the first time,i think it was love at first time,it really was one of a kind..<br />
Lets hope bmw continues its tradition and that the F10 can step in to the footsteps of the King of midsize luxury sedans.<br />
Long live the E60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-169045</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-169045</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing that out, Jp. I didn&#039;t realize that I made that typo. It has been corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing that out, Jp. I didn&#8217;t realize that I made that typo. It has been corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-169031</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-169031</guid>
		<description>It seems now that the 2 numbers at the end also reflect the power output of the engine. The 528 is a 3.0L engine however it&#039;s not as powerful as the 530 3.0L engine. Same with the 535, it&#039;s a 3.0L engine but it&#039;s more powerful than the 530. Just the way I look at it.

Same with the 545i and 550i.... they are 4.4L and 4.8L engines, not 4.5L and 5.0L.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems now that the 2 numbers at the end also reflect the power output of the engine. The 528 is a 3.0L engine however it&#8217;s not as powerful as the 530 3.0L engine. Same with the 535, it&#8217;s a 3.0L engine but it&#8217;s more powerful than the 530. Just the way I look at it.</p>
<p>Same with the 545i and 550i&#8230;. they are 4.4L and 4.8L engines, not 4.5L and 5.0L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babken</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-169020</link>
		<dc:creator>Babken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-169020</guid>
		<description>The King (E60) is gone. Long live the King (F10)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The King (E60) is gone. Long live the King (F10)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: X5SoB</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-169013</link>
		<dc:creator>X5SoB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-169013</guid>
		<description>And the 535i is also powered by a 3.0 liter engine, what&#039;s your point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the 535i is also powered by a 3.0 liter engine, what&#8217;s your point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: X5SoB</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-169012</link>
		<dc:creator>X5SoB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-169012</guid>
		<description>The E60 was the best of the Bangle inspired designs, and its style was widely copied by the automotive industry, just look at the current Camry and Accord. The F10 looks to be an evolutionary step backwards, which really is too bad. BMW was able to avoid the styling miasma that aflficted Jaguar, Jaguar&#039;s XJ and S-Type(and X-Type) were widely heralded by the automotive press as &quot;Classic&quot; and &quot;Timeless&quot;, and the buying public stayed away in droves. The 7, 6, and 5 were called &quot;Ugly&quot; and &quot;Awkward&quot; by the automotive press, and the buying public voted with their wallets. Just goes to show, &quot;Experts&quot; are frequently full of shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The E60 was the best of the Bangle inspired designs, and its style was widely copied by the automotive industry, just look at the current Camry and Accord. The F10 looks to be an evolutionary step backwards, which really is too bad. BMW was able to avoid the styling miasma that aflficted Jaguar, Jaguar&#8217;s XJ and S-Type(and X-Type) were widely heralded by the automotive press as &#8220;Classic&#8221; and &#8220;Timeless&#8221;, and the buying public stayed away in droves. The 7, 6, and 5 were called &#8220;Ugly&#8221; and &#8220;Awkward&#8221; by the automotive press, and the buying public voted with their wallets. Just goes to show, &#8220;Experts&#8221; are frequently full of shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jp Albano</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-169010</link>
		<dc:creator>Jp Albano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-169010</guid>
		<description>Great article, but the 528 is powered by the 3.0 liter engine - N52 if I remember correctly, and not 2.8 liters as one would think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, but the 528 is powered by the 3.0 liter engine &#8211; N52 if I remember correctly, and not 2.8 liters as one would think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BA</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-168987</link>
		<dc:creator>BA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-168987</guid>
		<description>Test drove on &#039;06 and absolutely loved it. From its inception in &#039;04 - I never thought the look of the car was controversial. Hard lines with a smooth flow. No other brands at its time had that. Albeit the headlights were OK for their design. I just hope the F10 isn&#039;t predicated on what was controversial 3 or 4 years a go. As you look around now, all brands have some sort of characteristics, be it lines or contours that make it unique and some what controversial. But that&#039;s where the market is at. It&#039;s about recognizing the car - whether or not you like the brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test drove on &#8217;06 and absolutely loved it. From its inception in &#8217;04 &#8211; I never thought the look of the car was controversial. Hard lines with a smooth flow. No other brands at its time had that. Albeit the headlights were OK for their design. I just hope the F10 isn&#8217;t predicated on what was controversial 3 or 4 years a go. As you look around now, all brands have some sort of characteristics, be it lines or contours that make it unique and some what controversial. But that&#8217;s where the market is at. It&#8217;s about recognizing the car &#8211; whether or not you like the brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viper</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-168986</link>
		<dc:creator>viper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-168986</guid>
		<description>it was a nice car , the new one however wont be so radical but I hope better than e60 , much better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was a nice car , the new one however wont be so radical but I hope better than e60 , much better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-168975</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-168975</guid>
		<description>Those headlights are a little too flamboyant, almost tacky, but the rest of it is nice. Fortunately the new 5s will have very different headlights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those headlights are a little too flamboyant, almost tacky, but the rest of it is nice. Fortunately the new 5s will have very different headlights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @iamPitman</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-168971</link>
		<dc:creator>@iamPitman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-168971</guid>
		<description>The design throught me at first, but it grew on me very fast. The M5 was appreciated from the get go, I still love that vehicle.  Depending on depreciated when the F10 drops, I might snag one up for a low price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The design throught me at first, but it grew on me very fast. The M5 was appreciated from the get go, I still love that vehicle.  Depending on depreciated when the F10 drops, I might snag one up for a low price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wazon8</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-168966</link>
		<dc:creator>wazon8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-168966</guid>
		<description>E60 with M-kit is one of the best looking BMW ever made. It was eighter highly technologically advanced car when appear. It&#039;s enough to look at diesels in E60, which - despite their age - are still better than diesels in brand new E-class. Not mentioning about M5 E60, which - I believe - in ten years gonna be cult car, if it&#039;s not such yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E60 with M-kit is one of the best looking BMW ever made. It was eighter highly technologically advanced car when appear. It&#8217;s enough to look at diesels in E60, which &#8211; despite their age &#8211; are still better than diesels in brand new E-class. Not mentioning about M5 E60, which &#8211; I believe &#8211; in ten years gonna be cult car, if it&#8217;s not such yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Straight Six</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/11/18/e60e61-5-series-thank-you-bmw/#comment-168917</link>
		<dc:creator>Straight Six</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23920#comment-168917</guid>
		<description>Agreed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

