At the moment, fully autonomous vehicles simply are not possible. Machines cannot replicate the human mind when it comes to driving an automobile. Our ability to see situations in real time, understand them and recognize what to do simply cannot be replicated by computers yet. However, the day when it is possible is likely coming and Tesla wants to be prepared. That’s why the Silicon Valley-based brand is offering a suite of self-driving hardware technology on all new vehicles, right now, so that when the software catches up to the hardware, owners will be ready.
Continue Reading Below
Of course, because of this, Elon Musk is claiming that Tesla is the car company with the first fully-autonomous capabilities. Which is true, if you forget that it’s not. I do admit that I admire Tesla’s moxie, offering a suite of new hardware to customers that they can’t even use yet, but might be able to in a few years. That’s bold. That’s bolder than bold. And it gets even more so when you factor in the cost.
Musk told reporters that this suite of eight cameras and various other sensors would cost $8,000 (although if you add up the cost of the packages on Tesla’s site, it’s $10,000). That’s a lot of money to spend on a car for options you can’t even use for years to come and on a car you may not even own by the time you actually can use them.
Plus, who’s to say that the hardware included in the package (eight cameras, twelve ultrasonic sensors with 360 degree monitoring capability and a very powerful on-board processor) won’t be outdated by the time fully autonomous capabilities arrive? What if a new company, or even Tesla itself, develops a new technology that makes cameras and sensors a thing of the past? With technology so rapidly advancing these days, as new tech makes year-old tech obsolete every day, it’s not a far-fetched idea. Could these sensors theoretically allow a new Tesla to be completely self-driving if software were to catch up? Probably, but that’s a big “if” and there’s no immediately foreseeable future where that “if” becomes a “when”.
Edwin Olson, Associate Computer Science Professor the University of Michigan recently told a Vox reporter “There’s a long ways to go in all of these areas,” speaking about autonomous driving. “And reliability is the biggest challenge of all. Humans aren’t perfect, but we’re amazingly good drivers when you think about it, with 100 million miles driven for every fatality. The reality is that a robot system has to perform at least at that level, and getting all these weird interactions right can make the difference between a fatality every 100 million miles and a fatality every 1 million miles.” So we’re really not that close to perfecting self-driving cars, which makes preemptively buying hardware for a technology that doesn’t fully exist yet somewhat silly.
I admire Tesla’s can-do attitude and dedication to creating self-driving vehicles. It’s admirable and definitely the future for the automotive industry. But not everyone is convinced. According to Edmunds Inc analyst Jessica Caldwell, this suite of options is a “vanity purchase” for both Tesla buyers. It allows buyers to boast about how they technically have fully-autonomous capabilities and it allows Musk to claim Tesla is the first company to do so, which is arguable.
Is the hardware impressive? Yes, it is. It features a series of cameras and sensors and enough processing power to monitor everything around it. That is, indeed, impressive. Even Tesla’s current Autopilot system is very impressive. However, without clever enough software, software that can replicate a human’s ability to recognize and diagnose any situation possible, it might not be as useful – for now.
“Machines cannot replicate the human mind when it comes to driving an automobile. Our ability to see situations in real time, understand them and recognize what to do simply cannot be replicated by computers yet.”
The most false statement I’ve read this week so far.
Care to elaborate as to why? Apparently, a professor from the University of Michigan seems to agree with our statement, as mentioned later in the article. So I’d be interested to hear your take as to why our statement is false.
That’s the truth, and that’s also why aviators disable Autopilot in emergency situations.
Tesla is putting the hardware suite in all cars coming off the production line, starting a few days ago. That will include the Model 3, and you don’t have to pay any extra to get the hardware, only to activate the software to get it to work (and you can do that after the fact, when all the regulatory hurdles have been passed). As for its self-driving capability, Tesla has posted a video of one of its cars with the new hardware/software self-driving around suburban streets (stopping at stop signs and red lights, etc.), and then when the driver gets out, the car finds an empty parking place and parks itself. It even reads the signs so as to know it can’t park in a handicapped place. Real progress. See this page for the video:
https://www.tesla.com/autopilot
There is one really important reason you missed as to why the system is not fully active. The law, certain laws make self driving cars illegal, test fleets of self driving cars have to be given special permission to operate on public roads. It’s similar to the reasons why you don’t see exterior mirrors replaced by cameras, laws dictate specifications for the mirrors, and the cameras don’t comply.
After that deadly accident a while ago, I would firmly keep both hands on a Tesla steering wheel. If the car doesn’t spontaneously burst into flames that is.
That accident had nothing to do with steering or holding the steering wheel. The car kept itself perfectly in its lane. It was like any other car with ACC and without claiming to have cross traffic detection. It won’t stop on its own at intersections or yield to cross traffic. It was driver error.
If you don’t want a car that bursts into flames, then get a Tesla. It’s probably the least likely car to do so.