2012 BMW M5 Test Drive: The Engine is the Heart of the Beast

BMW M5, Featured Posts, Test Drives | September 22nd, 2011 by 20

Laying quietly under a thin sheet of aluminum is BMW M’s latest technological marvel. Known internally as the S63tu (technical update), this latest M engine …

Laying quietly under a thin sheet of aluminum is BMW M’s latest technological marvel. Known internally as the S63tu (technical update), this latest M engine is an advancement over the previously employed S63 V8 in the X5/M and X6/M “Super-utes.” The basic layout and structure is the same, with both the S63, and S63tu sharing the same block, head, and the majority of components. Both engines are Twin Turbo, Twin Scroll 90′ V8 units featuring BMW’s patented cross-bank exhaust headers, continuously variable valve timing on both the intake and exhaust side, and high precision direct fuel injection.

However, a divergence occurs due to the new M5’s higher compression ratio of 1:10. In fact, BMW M have made so many changes to the original S63 V8 found in the X/M cars that they have labeled it a “newly developed” engine. To create the higher compression ratio BMW have fitted newly shaped pistons. Boost pressure has been dropped by 0.1 Bar, but larger intercoolers have been added. The turbo chargers themselves are also new, feature a larger turbine diameter. A new valvetrain has been added wherein BMW has used Valvetronic variable valve lift throttle the intake, and throttle bodies exist in the engine, but they are in hibernation, used only in “limp home” mode. BMW has also completely revamped the electronic engine management in nearly every parameter, resulting in several improvements including a higher redline, now found at 7,200 rpm.

1117 655x436

You’re probably wondering: with all of these changes, how come the new M5 only gained 5 horsepower over the X/M cars? The short answer is, BMW have chosen to focus on efficiency and drivability (read: throttle response) over all-out horsepower. Is the M division capable of squeezing more power out of the new M5 engine? Undoubtably. But as history testifies, massive horsepower has never been what M cars are truly about.

So how does efficiency compare to the previous generation E60 M5? The new F10 M5 drinks 30% less fuel – a staggering figure no doubt – while producing 10 percent more power and 30 percent more torque. This increase in efficiency will be greatly appreciated by all – even those who believe global warming is a scam – because as consumption is reduced, range in increased, which means fewer stops at the petrol station, or potentially no stops on your lengthy road trip (especially considering the massive 80 Liter fuel tank). On the EU test cycle the new M5 managed 9.9 Liters/100 Km (28.5 mpg). Those who aren’t stuck on the couch watching conspiracy theory movies will also appreciate the reduced emissions, now down to a very un-supercar-like 232 g/km in the EU5 test cycle.

One of the defining features of the M5’s M engine is its compact layout, placing both turbos and catalytic converters inside the ‘V’ of the 90′ cylinder banks. Like too many people on the dance floor, things get pretty cramped and hot in this small space. Engine cooling is therefore of paramount importance, and an extremely powerful cooling system including large intercoolers have been used to meet this demand. The front end aerodynamics have also been sculpted to guide sufficient airflow into the radiators and around the engine and brakes.

1416 655x434

Besides its compact design, the placement of the turbos within the ‘V’ of the cylinder banks has one particular benefit: throttle response. As you decrease the distance from the exhaust valves to the turbine blades of the turbo, you decrease the amount of time it takes for the exhaust gases to reach, and spin the turbine – which in turn increases intake boost. Typical turbo charged engines suffer from ‘turbo lag’ – the time delay between stepping on the throttle (the exhaust pressures building, the turbos spooling, intake pressures building) and feeling acceleration. In short, BMW M’s design solution almost completely eliminates perceptible lag. It’s that good. (For a more in-depth consideration of turbocharging and the technology behind it, hit the jump to our previous tech feature.)

Also reducing turbo lag is BMW’s patented cross-bank exhaust manifold. Each cylinder bank of four cylinders donates exhaust gases from one of its cylinders to one scroll of one turbo. Therefore, both scrolls of both turbos have two dedicated cylinders feeding them at all times – but the pairing of these cylinders is where we find the magic. Based on the firing order of the V8 across both banks of cylinders, an exhaust pulse is evenly distributed to both scrolls of both turbos, keeping them spooled at all times, and across the entire RPM range. It sounds impressive on paper, but in practice – it is staggering. Oh, and the sound! The unique routing of each cylinder through the manifold results in a very characteristic sound, something different and exotic to your ears. It only lends further credence to the labeling of the M5 as a consummate supercar.

The new M5 has so little throttle lag that you might as well say it has none, in the sphere of turbo-charged cars. Although physics suggests it is impossible to entirely remove lag from a turbocharged engine, your senses from behind the wheel will struggle to find any. Only in higher gears will you find a small disconnect between the gas pedal and the rear wheels. After driving the M5 I can say with authority that the new turbo V8 is nearly “lag free” in my books – and that’s a big statement. Throttle response is direct and precise enough to throttle steer and drift through rather tight roadways – and there could be no greater praise heaped upon the turbo V8. Car control is everything – especially in an M car.

I have spent a considerable amount of time punching in laps with BMW’s X6/M, and I’ve always been impressed with its near instantaneous throttle response. But the M5’s mill is better – it closes the gap to perfection. Whereas in the X6/M you still wait for the power to build, in the M5 it’s just there. It’s always there. Ready to thrill you, ready to break the rear tires loose in a tail-out power slide, ready to stretch your cheeks back and widen your eyeballs.

BMW’s previous M5, the E60 M5 was an impressive car in every way. It’s engine was phenomenally good – revving to a stratospheric 8,250 rpm. The V10 blazed its way to maximum power output of 507 hp. But a key difference is found between the maniac V10 and the bludgeoner turbo V8: drivability. You see, the V10 managed 384 hp at 6,100 rpm, and it wasn’t until you hit 4000 + rpm that you began to feel a power surge. But the new M5’s V8 is different. It develops 100% – read it: one-hundred-percent of its torque at 1,500 rpm. This is axe-murderer appeal, the kind of brute twist that is borderline violent. There’s more… the torque output remains at 100% all the way until 5,750 rpm where it begins to drop off towards redline – but still not falling far below 400 lb ft at redline! What a machine. In fact, this engine produces 405 lb ft of torque a hair above its 1000 rpm idle. Parking valet boys: be forewarned.

So while it is true that the new M5 does not rev as high as its predecessor by approximately 1000 revs, it is also true that its powerband is approximately three times as wide – and that speaks volumes. As the saying goes, “horsepower sells cars, torque wins races.”

Maximum horsepower also finds a plateau to rest on between 6,000 rpm and 7,000 rpm. A full-bodied 560 horsepower leaves the crankshaft, dropping off slightly from 7,000 rpm to its 7,200 rpm redline. This drop off in power is seen on dynographs, but I assure you, it is not felt from the seat.

The new turbo V8 really is a marvel of engineering; a technological masterpiece better appreciated on the racetrack than on paper. On that note, stay tuned for our racetrack review of the new M5, to be published shortly. A full BMWBLOG First Drive review is soon to follow.

(Photos Credit: Daniel Kraus, Shawn Molnar)

20 responses to “2012 BMW M5 Test Drive: The Engine is the Heart of the Beast”

  1. M3power says:

    Nice info on the engine. How does it perform and handle on the track compared to the E60 M5?

  2. Love it Shawn! What a car. 

  3. Love it Shawn! What a car. 

  4. Andrew says:

    great writeup Shawn!

  5. Fauzi320 says:

    What a machine…..and global warming is still a scam

  6. Giom says:

    Thoroughly enjoyed this article! Great info!

  7. Marvellous car… But I was hope it will get much more power than e60 model – around 100HP more… There were some rumors about 580HP… Now it’s 560HP… Hope the Launch Control will let the driver to run to 100km/h in 4.0s :) without Launch Control it will take about 4.4s :)

    • wazon says:

      Car and Driver claims that it’s able to do 0-60 mph in 3.8 sec. with launch control turn on: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/11q3/2013_bmw_m5-first_drive_review

  8. wazon says:

    Thanks for sharing with details about S63tu. Data sound very promising. Can’t wait for driver-review.

  9. wazon says:

    Thanks for sharing with details about S63tu. Data sound very promising. Can’t wait for driver-review.

  10. Mateo says:

    does anyone knows the weight of S63? S85 was 240 kg. How about  S63?

  11. Guest says:

    I understand the tires are not run-flat. Does the car come with the Mobility Kit? Thank you for the review.

  12. Mk4supramk4 says:

    BTW 3rd Time is the charm BUDDY, never heard of 5th time LOL
    V8 was a good idea thats why they brought it back ,But ill pass on new m5  v8 turbo ill prefer supercharged my e39 ///M and blow the new alluminium doors of that thing !!! also will even consider owning Chris Bangle Pile Of Crap  ///M Before owning New one at least its sounds better .True ///M cars died a decade ago  now all they need to come up with  is  computer to do the driving  Then ill be the real Ultimate Driving ///Machine !!

  13. Stealth98 says:

    I drive BMW for many years and I’m still very impressed the development team is able to outperform themselves. This is why I won’t change car brand. However the gap between the development team and the service department is still increasing. The performance of BMW service is not even close to what development does.


  14. Welc0me says:

    Is it just me or does that bmw look freakin ugly.The bmw may be the fastest lugsary sadan in its class but its not as convenient or as sexy or comfortable as its rivals,the audi a6.For the amout of money that car is it looks like crap.If the designers make it more convient,LIKE BIGER BACK SEATS!!!And tweak the styleing like a lot!!!!!!It might be worth a buy,but if you want a sexy european sadan for god sake get a dawm audi!!!

  15. Alexander says:

    Bmws are a well revered car but there are better options like the audi a6 or any one from the a seires

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.