Why it makes sense for BMW to offer different battery capacities for the i3

BMW i | March 15th, 2016 by 4
BMW i3 Shadow Sport edition black 750x500

Ever since last October when BMW CEO Harold Krueger stated that the 2017 BMW i3 would have an increased electric range, there’s been speculation on …

Ever since last October when BMW CEO Harold Krueger stated that the 2017 BMW i3 would have an increased electric range, there’s been speculation on how they would accomplish it. While BMW hasn’t made any official announcements yet, it’s widely believed that BMW will be using the new Samsung 94Ah battery cells for the 2017 i3, which I first speculated here, back in November.

The current i3 uses 96 Samsung 60Ah battery cells which are 3.75v ea. This adds up to a total of 21.6kWh (96 x 60 x 3.75 = 21.6). The new 94Ah cells are the same physical size and voltage so an upgrade to these cells would mean BMW could use the same modules and battery tray, greatly reducing the cost as compared to engineering all new packaging for the new cells. Therefore, the new pack should increase from 21.6kWh to 33.8kWh (96 x 94 x 3.7 = 33.8). If the weight of the cells is the same, that should increase the BEV i3’s range from the existing 81 miles per charge to approximately 125 miles per charge and the i3 REx’s range from 72 miles per charge to about 112 MPC.

BMW i3 two years old 2 750x499

So we know for sure that the 2017 i3 which begins production this summer will have increased range from improved battery cells, and we believe we’ve figured out which cells BMW will be using. The next logical question then is: Will that be the only battery available for the 2017 i3, or will BMW also continue to offer the current 60Ah cells as a lower cost battery pack option? We say the latter.

As a comparison Tesla has always offered different battery pack options for the Model S. That, along with direct sales and the Supercharger network been part of the fabric which has made the Model S so appealing to so many people. But there is another example of an OEM offering battery size options which is an even better comparison, and that’s Nissan. Ever since the Nissan LEAF launched in late 2010, it had been fitted with a 24 kWh battery pack. Just past Fall Nissan added a 30kWh battery pack as an option. The entry level “S” model still has the 24kWh battery pack, but if you want the higher level SV or SL trims, you also get the new 30kWh battery pack.

BMW could do something like what Nissan did and continue to offer the 21.3kWh battery pack, but only on a base i3, to offer a lower cost option. Or they could do like Tesla does and simply allow the customer to choose the battery size they want like any other option. This will however drive dealers nuts because they now have to stock four different i3’s, instead of they two they currently do. I’m going to predict this is indeed what BMW does, and if that is correct, here’s the 2017 i3 options that will be available as early as this September:

BEV with 21.3kWh battery and 81mi electric range

REx with 21.3kWh battery, 72 mi electric range & 74 mi additional gas range (39mpg x 1.9gal)

BEV with 33.8kWh battery and ~125 mi electric range

REx with 33.8kWh battery, ~112 mi electric range & 93 mi additional gas range (39mpg x 2.4gal)

Note the gasoline range on the 33.8kWh i3 REx increased from 74 miles to 93 miles. That’s because in the US, BMW reduced the amount of gasoline available on the car to 1.9 gallons, even though the fuel tank is actually 2.4 gallons. European customers have had access to the full 2.4 gallons all along, and will continue to do so. The reduced gas availability in the US was so the car would be classified as a CARB (California Air Resource Board) BEVx vehicle, giving BMW the maximum amount of the valuable ZEV credits, and qualifying the i3 for additional state rebates and tax exemptions. However, with the larger battery and longer all electric range, the i3 REx can now utilize the entire 2.4 gallons and still have BEVx designation, so I see no reason why BMW wouldn’t remove the gas tank restriction and give access to the full 2.4 gallons. That would increase the overall combined range of the i3 REx from its current 142 mi to 205 mi.

BMW i3 MR PORTER Design Limited Edition 2016 Genf Autosalon Live 01 750x497

Of course we’re still just speculating here, and as we draw closer to the beginning of production for the 2017 model year i3 BMW has been as tight lipped as always on new or improved models. Perhaps the announcement will happen next week at NYIAS, or BMW may wait until closer to the 2017 launch as to not really kill sales of the remaining 2016 i3 inventory. In any event, the improved range will be a welcomed improvement for the i3, if not a necessary one. The new 30kWh battery pack of the Nissan LEAF is only a temporary improvement, as it’s been strongly rumored that the 2018 LEAF may have a 60kWh battery. That, coincidently matches the 2017 Chevy Bolt’s 60kWH battery pack, and that EV will boast a 200 mile all electric range.

I’m sure BMW realizes they need to continuously improve the battery in their EV’s if they want to be competitive, and this LCI refresh for the i3 proves that BMW isn’t going to sit idle and let the competition leave them in the dust.

4 responses to “Why it makes sense for BMW to offer different battery capacities for the i3”

  1. Chris Llana says:

    Nice analysis, Tom. It will be interesting to see what battery options Tesla offers for the Model 3, as compared to the 2018 LEAF and the Bolt.

    • Tommolog says:

      Thanks Chris. 2018/2019 are going to be great years for EVs, lots of really cool options. I suspect the 2nd gen i3 will probably launch in late 2018 as a 2019 model with a comparable 200 mile range. Good things to come.

  2. George Jewett says:

    Thank you for the informed article. I understand that this is speculation though your assessments seem logical. It would seem that keeping the current lower battery as a part of the line up would mitigate some of the stigma associated with the excess inventory. I would welcome the larger capacity battery and access to the extra half gallon of gas in the tank. All that being said I would only get the new model if I could access the hold mode as the European models due (or USA versions with the code switched). Ninety-five percent of my travel is within the electric range of my i3 though on those occasional weekends away from the Bay Area engaging the REX at 75% , keeping the battery in reserve, and filling the tank each hour has been essential.

    I am firmly in the camp of driving around in a car with a battery that is large enough for most of my travel and having the range extender provide for the exceptional trip. I imagine the Bolt on the small end of the BEV spectrum and any Tesla batteries are much heavier and result in lower efficiency. It is a bit like going on a regular hike with a twelve ounce bottle of water rather than carrying a gallon jug of water and the associated burden.

  3. iDriver says:

    Great article indeed! I agree the different options will broaden the potential customer base for the i3.
    Here in Europe I think the longer range all-electric version should be quite attractive, especially with roll-out of DC fast charging networks in most countries. Just did 800 km this w-e with my i3 BEV (not in one day though) and I have to say fast charging is already a great experience in the Benelux (especially Fastned has done a great job with multiple chargers per station and solar roof). Of course with a larger battery it would be more convenient.
    As CCS fast charging is preparing to move from 50 to 150 kW (should be in place in Europe by 2018/19), the next question is what fast charging options BMW will offer on its larger battery i-vehicles? Again another balance to be struck here: a very large battery (useful in areas where fast charging is not dense enough or too slow) or a somewhat smaller battery but with 150 kW charging capability.
    With 150 kW charging, the larger battery will only slightly reduce the number of stops (on longer trips), so the additional cost and weight may not be worth it anymore. Could be another element of variation in the models/pricing of the cars.
    Curious whether you have any views or insights on what BMW is having in mind on the charging side (for models further down the line). The Chevy Bolt seems not to be able to handle more than 50kW charging. Commercial/cost strategy or battery-related limitations? The Hyundai Ioniq (like the Kia Soul EV) will be able to take 100 kW Chademo, and that with only a 28kWh battery.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *