The luxury SUV killed the luxury Car

BMW X5 | April 30th, 2015 by 5
Bild Vergleich BMW X5 xDrive40e Mercedes GLE 500 e PHEV Hybrid SUV 2015 01 750x500

Recently, we spoke about the kind of customer who would buy a BMW X5 M. Basically, the answer was whoever had the money and wanted …

Recently, we spoke about the kind of customer who would buy a BMW X5 M. Basically, the answer was whoever had the money and wanted one. That seems like a simple answer, but it’s true. It just comes down to desire. But that desire isn’t just for the X5 M, but for all luxury SUVs. The luxury SUV is something that, generally, is pointless. The entire purpose behind an SUV is to do the things, and go to places, that regular cars can’t, like go off-road, tow and carry equipment. A luxury SUV can do those things, but just barely, as being luxurious is their main focus. And because of their lumbering size and mass, they don’t drive as well as their car counterparts.

2015 bmw x5 m 1900x1200 15 750x500

However, despite the apparent lack of need for the luxury SUV, they are killing the luxury car in terms of sales. The trend started with Mercedes-Benz, in 1998, when it debuted the M Class. You remember the oddly camo colored M Class in The Lost World: Jurassic Park, right? That’s the car that spawned the craze. People realized that they could get a Mercedes-Benz with the same luxuries as an E Class, but with more cargo space and some actual off-roading chops, for the same price. If you tell people, especially us Yanks, that we can have more for the same price, we’re going to sign up in droves.

1998 mercedes benz m class front three quarters 750x469

Which is exactly what happened. The M Class was an instant success, and spawned virtually every other automaker to follow suit shortly after. Now each and every luxury automaker has at least one luxury SUV. Even Porsche, the no-nonsense sports car king, has two SUVs, simply because they are so successful. In fact, Porsche’s best selling model is the Cayenne, outselling even the iconic 911. BMW was quick to follow Mercedes’ lead with the X5, which has been a sales phenom ever since. Now BMW has the X1, X3, X4, X5 and X6. The Bavarians are even thinking about making an X7. With the exclusion of the X7, that’s five SUV’s within the last two decades.


The luxury SUV is easily the most popular car segment today. Drive five minutes in any direction, anywhere in the world and you can probably count 10-15 of them, whether they be Mercedes, BMW, Audi, Land Rover or Porsche. It’s impossible not to, they’re everywhere. That’s because everyone wants the big luxury monster to prove to everyone else that they have more than the next guy. Very rarely does a family buy a Mercedes-Benz GL Class for its practicality.

It’s this desire to get more for your money, to have something so big and luxurious that can also, supposedly, go off-road. While almost zero of them will ever see anything other than tarmac underneath their wheels, the idea that they can go off the beaten track is tempting. Giving a luxury SUV off-road capability is like giving James Bond a license to kill. He’s still the same dapper guy, just now he has a gun and can use it. How could someone not be tempted by such a prospect?

So it is understandable, why we love big luxury SUVs over luxury cars. It gives you more for your money, and that is pretty universally desired. Even though they don’t drive as well as their luxury car counterparts, except for maybe the Range Rover, the offer a value proposition almost too tempting to pass on. On paper, luxury SUVs seem like velvet-lined Swiss Army knives; luxurious but with the ability to do anything. The luxury SUV killed the luxury car, and it isn’t hard to see why.

Jalopnik published an article on this topic also. 

5 responses to “The luxury SUV killed the luxury Car”

  1. Mike N. says:

    You should at least acknowledge Doug DeMuro’s article on the very same subject, not two days ago:

  2. CDspeed says:

    Actually, I live in a hurricane prone area, SUVs can deal with standing water a lot better then most other vehicles. Many of them can take around 20 inches of water, give or take depending on make and model.

  3. fathornyblackandjoe says:

    This is a true observation, but kind of pointless. I mean…functionality “mash ups” have been going on in the industry for decades. What makes sense or not just depends on perspective. For example, one could have said that mini-vans made no sense–they’re bigger and more unwieldy than sedans, but can’t carry as much as full-sized vans. OR you could say that they’re the perfect combination of size and utility for busy families (or small businesses) with lots of varied activities and needs. Sport Sedans also “don’t make sense”…they don’t usually have the space or the fuel-efficiency of a full-sized sedan, but they cannot compete with real sports cars, either.

    People have always wanted multiple functions from their vehicles, and auto makers have been packaging functionality in various combinations for (nearly) ever. Luxury SUVs is just the most recent category of packaging which combines luxury features with some off-road and some cargo capabilities (and, frankly, some “smart” marketing…e.g. “SAV” vs. “SUV”).

  4. Levi says:

    The only true SUV is Toyota LC/Lexus LX. The only true utility car is a pick-up (Toyota Hilux,…, pick yours up). Although no more used for what what they should be, Jeep Wrangler and Mercedes G Wagen are also true. All other SUVs are fake.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *