<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMW Z4 gets the M-Pack treatment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/29/bmw-z4-gets-the-m-pack-treatment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/29/bmw-z4-gets-the-m-pack-treatment/</link>
	<description>BMW News, Reviews, Test Drives, Photos And Videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jon H</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/29/bmw-z4-gets-the-m-pack-treatment/#comment-163125</link>
		<dc:creator>jon H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23119#comment-163125</guid>
		<description>I agree.  I was going to comment that I pretty specifically remember BMW AG pulling the same stunt with the old Z4, saying there would be no full M model, then popping one out a few years later.  

i think there will fore surely be a z4 m in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  I was going to comment that I pretty specifically remember BMW AG pulling the same stunt with the old Z4, saying there would be no full M model, then popping one out a few years later.  </p>
<p>i think there will fore surely be a z4 m in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 100$ GUY</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/29/bmw-z4-gets-the-m-pack-treatment/#comment-162936</link>
		<dc:creator>100$ GUY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23119#comment-162936</guid>
		<description>It better add some more power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It better add some more power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobo</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/29/bmw-z4-gets-the-m-pack-treatment/#comment-162821</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23119#comment-162821</guid>
		<description>This car with the current high revving M3 V8! Please BMW build this car! Think about some of your base, hardcore, fans. Not only for the rich people in Eastern Europe and The Middle East.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This car with the current high revving M3 V8! Please BMW build this car! Think about some of your base, hardcore, fans. Not only for the rich people in Eastern Europe and The Middle East.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaybach Khan</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/29/bmw-z4-gets-the-m-pack-treatment/#comment-162798</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaybach Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23119#comment-162798</guid>
		<description>its stupid to have m versions of suv models and not of an roadster...
every z model had m version..i hope time will help them to understand the logic..sport car must have m version...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its stupid to have m versions of suv models and not of an roadster&#8230;<br />
every z model had m version..i hope time will help them to understand the logic..sport car must have m version&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEAN</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/29/bmw-z4-gets-the-m-pack-treatment/#comment-162794</link>
		<dc:creator>DEAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23119#comment-162794</guid>
		<description>Of course there will be an m z4. but it will be interduced in the makeover version in about 3 or 4 years. But a m sport s driver35 sprots pack will do nicely for now. a fixed carbon roof mz4 with 4.0 v8 and dsg thats what im talking about. a baby sl black. has everyone seen the the old m z4 race car. and remember what they said about ther not being a m version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course there will be an m z4. but it will be interduced in the makeover version in about 3 or 4 years. But a m sport s driver35 sprots pack will do nicely for now. a fixed carbon roof mz4 with 4.0 v8 and dsg thats what im talking about. a baby sl black. has everyone seen the the old m z4 race car. and remember what they said about ther not being a m version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/29/bmw-z4-gets-the-m-pack-treatment/#comment-162771</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=23119#comment-162771</guid>
		<description>Wow. This car is going to be outrageous with an M package. It already looks aggressive and now they&#039;re going to add to it! Awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. This car is going to be outrageous with an M package. It already looks aggressive and now they&#8217;re going to add to it! Awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

