<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Track Tested by Edmunds: BMW X6 M 0-60 4.3 sec</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/07/track-tested-bmw-x6-m-0-60-4-3-sec/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/07/track-tested-bmw-x6-m-0-60-4-3-sec/</link>
	<description>BMW News, Reviews, Test Drives, Photos And Videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/07/track-tested-bmw-x6-m-0-60-4-3-sec/#comment-310680</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21817#comment-310680</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I wasn&#039;t directing the comments to you people who just posted.  I was actually answering on a racing forum but posted here by mistake.     OOPs.  

Its a great SAV.  Love it.  Don&#039;t race against it.  Its idiot proof too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I wasn&#8217;t directing the comments to you people who just posted.  I was actually answering on a racing forum but posted here by mistake.     OOPs.  </p>
<p>Its a great SAV.  Love it.  Don&#8217;t race against it.  Its idiot proof too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/07/track-tested-bmw-x6-m-0-60-4-3-sec/#comment-310677</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21817#comment-310677</guid>
		<description>You have not idea how good this SAV SUV  what ever the name is;  It is absolutely amazing.  It puts most sports cars to shame and it drives very well in the snow.  I had it for a few weeks now and im loving it even more. If you have a sports car, try not to pull up for a race, you&#039;ll try to find a logical reason why you just lost.  If you engage in a highway battle, you&#039;ll end up selling the ferrari.   THis car is a beast and is undeniably the fastest and scariest SUV on the planet.
All you people who just like to post for the sake of posting, you need to really understand the technology and the advancement that this car has.  
There&#039;s a reason why all the bmw , porsch and Merc guys are trashing it.  THIS 5400LB car if not beat them , it can come pretty close to them.   They call this car Darth Vadar, I wonder why.
Don&#039;t believe the people who make arguments like 1.  Not Room  2.  Can go offroad, Bla Bla BLa.  Its all talk.  Once you have it.  All that goes out the door..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have not idea how good this SAV SUV  what ever the name is;  It is absolutely amazing.  It puts most sports cars to shame and it drives very well in the snow.  I had it for a few weeks now and im loving it even more. If you have a sports car, try not to pull up for a race, you&#8217;ll try to find a logical reason why you just lost.  If you engage in a highway battle, you&#8217;ll end up selling the ferrari.   THis car is a beast and is undeniably the fastest and scariest SUV on the planet.<br />
All you people who just like to post for the sake of posting, you need to really understand the technology and the advancement that this car has.<br />
There&#8217;s a reason why all the bmw , porsch and Merc guys are trashing it.  THIS 5400LB car if not beat them , it can come pretty close to them.   They call this car Darth Vadar, I wonder why.<br />
Don&#8217;t believe the people who make arguments like 1.  Not Room  2.  Can go offroad, Bla Bla BLa.  Its all talk.  Once you have it.  All that goes out the door..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/07/track-tested-bmw-x6-m-0-60-4-3-sec/#comment-273411</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21817#comment-273411</guid>
		<description>Porche aka volkswagon will never be better than BMW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Porche aka volkswagon will never be better than BMW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elitecrete</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/07/track-tested-bmw-x6-m-0-60-4-3-sec/#comment-204163</link>
		<dc:creator>elitecrete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21817#comment-204163</guid>
		<description>Hmm, 

I own a 2008 BMW X5 3.0, a 2004 Porsche Cayenne Turbo and previously owned a 2003 BMW M3 and I have to say that Porsche makes a much better vehicle than BMW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, </p>
<p>I own a 2008 BMW X5 3.0, a 2004 Porsche Cayenne Turbo and previously owned a 2003 BMW M3 and I have to say that Porsche makes a much better vehicle than BMW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2010 BMW X5 M Track Video</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/07/track-tested-bmw-x6-m-0-60-4-3-sec/#comment-158398</link>
		<dc:creator>2010 BMW X5 M Track Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21817#comment-158398</guid>
		<description>[...] we have one advice: watch the video below. After seeing the impressive performance coming from the X6 M SAC, we were looking forward seeing the other &#8220;twin&#8221; on track and judging by the footage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we have one advice: watch the video below. After seeing the impressive performance coming from the X6 M SAC, we were looking forward seeing the other &#8220;twin&#8221; on track and judging by the footage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edmunds: 2010 BMW X5 M Test Drive</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/07/track-tested-bmw-x6-m-0-60-4-3-sec/#comment-157492</link>
		<dc:creator>Edmunds: 2010 BMW X5 M Test Drive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21817#comment-157492</guid>
		<description>[...] giving us a great article on the new BMW X6 M, the fellows at Edmunds are returning with a review of the &#8220;other twin&#8221;, BMW X5 M. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] giving us a great article on the new BMW X6 M, the fellows at Edmunds are returning with a review of the &#8220;other twin&#8221;, BMW X5 M. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 100$ GUY</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/07/track-tested-bmw-x6-m-0-60-4-3-sec/#comment-157454</link>
		<dc:creator>100$ GUY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21817#comment-157454</guid>
		<description>I gotta say I am hugely impressed with the all around perfomance of this bavarian machine....just wow, my jaw dropped and I can´t shut my mouth yet lol.
Really, this is vastly superior than the cayenne turbo (his main competitor given prices) and even superior than the turbo S that costs like $40k more....
Goodness, bmw is the king of perfomance SUVs right now, no doubt.
How could someone prefer the cayenne? Im sorry only if u are deaf,blind, or just a moron. At least that is my opinion.
It just too quick....too fast and quick....oh my God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta say I am hugely impressed with the all around perfomance of this bavarian machine&#8230;.just wow, my jaw dropped and I can´t shut my mouth yet lol.<br />
Really, this is vastly superior than the cayenne turbo (his main competitor given prices) and even superior than the turbo S that costs like $40k more&#8230;.<br />
Goodness, bmw is the king of perfomance SUVs right now, no doubt.<br />
How could someone prefer the cayenne? Im sorry only if u are deaf,blind, or just a moron. At least that is my opinion.<br />
It just too quick&#8230;.too fast and quick&#8230;.oh my God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badger</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/07/track-tested-bmw-x6-m-0-60-4-3-sec/#comment-157317</link>
		<dc:creator>badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21817#comment-157317</guid>
		<description>Who is the BMW X6M for?
Seems like BMW have entered the new M Sav into a market which does not exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is the BMW X6M for?<br />
Seems like BMW have entered the new M Sav into a market which does not exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ferrarifan</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/07/track-tested-bmw-x6-m-0-60-4-3-sec/#comment-157270</link>
		<dc:creator>ferrarifan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21817#comment-157270</guid>
		<description>Actually, it&#039;s the 60-0 I am impressed with. A jaw dropping 107ft!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#8217;s the 60-0 I am impressed with. A jaw dropping 107ft!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

