For years, Sports Utility Vehicles have been one of the most popular choices among U.S. consumers, mostly due to the inexpensive gasoline that we all took for granted. Shortly after the gas prices skyrocketed, a shift in the car buying mentality has occurred. All of a sudden, many U.S. buyers started to look at more fuel efficient methods for transportation.
These were the same times when luxury automakers were battling with the strict emission regulations in the U.S. and fuel efficient diesel engines have been delayed due to these rules.
In an attempt to win the consumer’s confidence in diesel powerplants, BMW, Mercedes and Audi launched diesel powered vehicles of their most popular SUVs or SAV in BMW’s case. The new X5d, Mercedes GL and Audi Q7 TDI have been battling ever since to win the supremacy in this segment and several test reviews or comparisons have been printed.
Today, Wall Street Journal makes another attempt to put these three vehicles head-to-head. Let’s find out what their findings were.
As gasoline prices rose last year, and large, fuel-thirsty sport-utility vehicles fell from favor, car companies looked for ways to restore the SUV’s appeal.
Newer car-like models called crossovers are lighter and more efficient than earlier SUVs, but only slightly. And their fuel economy, while improved over older models, is poor in day-to-day use.
Now three European carmakers are selling large SUVs with diesel engines that promise the fuel economy of a midsize car, and the power and hauling capacity of a truck. The Audi Q7, BMW X5 and Mercedes-Benz GL have been on the market for years with gasoline engines, but this year is the first time diesel versions of all three have been available in the U.S.
Driving them revealed the advantages of quiet, cleaner-burning modern diesels. But each vehicle also had frustrating qualities that left me wondering what might have been.
The BMW X5 35d was the sports car of the group, not only accelerating quickly but handling well enough to make me look forward to driving on twisting back roads. If you are considering buying a sporty luxury station wagon, the X5, which costs $51,200, would be a fitting choice.
2 Responses to “WSJ comparing diesels: BMW X5, Audi Q7 and Mercedes-Benz GL”
Leave a Reply
Preview: 2010 BMW 5-series revealed
2012 BMW 3-series
BMW M-Zero concept
Renderings: 2012 BMW M6
Renderings: 2012 BMW 3 Series
- Doug: It’s just the top roof panel though, and it’s not stressing the panel in the way that CF would give...
- Doug: That’s true, if it’s not fast enough to roll the car in more likely scenarios, then there’s...
- Jordan: From: BMW To: viper Keep talking bit*h, you’re making me famous!
- Jordan: yea i’ve talked to many very disappointed mercedes owners lately who say their car has been in the...
- Jordan: i get a kick out of you eh! you are quite the confused child. you say the S class is the “best car on...
-
- BMW 1-Series
- From 18/28 mpg | MSRP from $29,400
-
- BMW 3-Series
- From 18/28 mpg | MSRP from $33,600
-
- BMW 5-Series
- From 18/28 mpg | MSRP from $45,800














designed by
not being biased to BMW, but one has to wonder how reliable is this test. I mean with Audi being the heaviest yet has that much advantage on MPG side sounds a bit weird to me. they probably focused more on highway cruising than city driving or just didn’t do apple to apple comparison.
Интересно..