<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: And another BMW M5 vs. Cadillac CTS-V</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/</link>
	<description>BMW News, Reviews, Test Drives, Photos And Videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:30:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: narrowband</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-159868</link>
		<dc:creator>narrowband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-159868</guid>
		<description>Has it occured to anyone why the M5 had &quot;XFR&quot; in its registration number? Though I still think the Jag won&#039;t be able to beat ths CTSV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has it occured to anyone why the M5 had &#8220;XFR&#8221; in its registration number? Though I still think the Jag won&#8217;t be able to beat ths CTSV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: car</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-158363</link>
		<dc:creator>car</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-158363</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQ7QkAOYkwA&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cadillac cts video&lt;/a&gt;. This cadillac really looks awesome. The parts, engine and accessories was really nice and fits for the car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQ7QkAOYkwA" rel="nofollow">cadillac cts video</a>. This cadillac really looks awesome. The parts, engine and accessories was really nice and fits for the car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: car</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-158362</link>
		<dc:creator>car</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-158362</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your cadillac cts video. This cadillac really looks awesome. The parts, engine and accessories was really nice and fits for the car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your cadillac cts video. This cadillac really looks awesome. The parts, engine and accessories was really nice and fits for the car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-157616</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-157616</guid>
		<description>Lousy driving. I&#039;ve done a 12.56 with my E60 M5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lousy driving. I&#8217;ve done a 12.56 with my E60 M5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelz</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-157271</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-157271</guid>
		<description>Why was the lady given the M5? Disturbing I&#039;d say...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why was the lady given the M5? Disturbing I&#8217;d say&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-157233</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-157233</guid>
		<description>BTW, did anyone notice that the CTS-V had a 2&#039; tenth jump on the BMW?  (maybe 3&#039;, hard to tell without the right softwear).  This was a totally juvenile test without accurate timing.  The CTS-V probably still would have edged out the BMW in a straight line, but not by nearly the same margin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, did anyone notice that the CTS-V had a 2&#8242; tenth jump on the BMW?  (maybe 3&#8242;, hard to tell without the right softwear).  This was a totally juvenile test without accurate timing.  The CTS-V probably still would have edged out the BMW in a straight line, but not by nearly the same margin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMLBMW</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-157176</link>
		<dc:creator>JMLBMW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-157176</guid>
		<description>I drove Cadillacs back in their hey day... but not until recently has the Caddy come back... good for GM... it&#039;s about time! OK... that said... I am an avid BMW fan and driver. At present I am just finishing up a 2 year lease on my M coupe and it has been a real GAS... so to speak! What a GREAT machine! My new BMW was just finished yesterday in Germany and I am anxiously awaiting it&#039;s arrival. 

The new line of M cars coming from BMW will most certainly out run the latest from Cadillac. At least the horse power will be equal... which will give a much better comparison! Besides all that... BMW has never been just about being the fastest. It&#039;s about being the best all around sports car! The next comparison should be about not only straight line acceleration but cornering as well. Let&#039;s get these two cars on a track with professional drivers running head to head! Then we will know the real story. So... unitl then... BMW is The Ultimate Driving Machine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I drove Cadillacs back in their hey day&#8230; but not until recently has the Caddy come back&#8230; good for GM&#8230; it&#8217;s about time! OK&#8230; that said&#8230; I am an avid BMW fan and driver. At present I am just finishing up a 2 year lease on my M coupe and it has been a real GAS&#8230; so to speak! What a GREAT machine! My new BMW was just finished yesterday in Germany and I am anxiously awaiting it&#8217;s arrival. </p>
<p>The new line of M cars coming from BMW will most certainly out run the latest from Cadillac. At least the horse power will be equal&#8230; which will give a much better comparison! Besides all that&#8230; BMW has never been just about being the fastest. It&#8217;s about being the best all around sports car! The next comparison should be about not only straight line acceleration but cornering as well. Let&#8217;s get these two cars on a track with professional drivers running head to head! Then we will know the real story. So&#8230; unitl then&#8230; BMW is The Ultimate Driving Machine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BmwM5Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-157115</link>
		<dc:creator>BmwM5Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-157115</guid>
		<description>who cares, cadillac isnt a headturner, whereas m5 will always be!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who cares, cadillac isnt a headturner, whereas m5 will always be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-157112</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-157112</guid>
		<description>The E60 is old, it&#039;s run it&#039;s production span and is being discontinued in December.  4 years is a very long time to improve upon a benchmark, and a comprehensive test would probably still show the M5 as the benchmark.  As the CTS-V was just released into production very recently, a more fair comparison will be against the new M5. 

By the way, I don&#039;t mean &quot;wrinkly skin - grandma&quot; old or &quot;moldy bread&quot; old, rather the M5 ages gracefully and gets better with age as with fine wine or cheese.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The E60 is old, it&#8217;s run it&#8217;s production span and is being discontinued in December.  4 years is a very long time to improve upon a benchmark, and a comprehensive test would probably still show the M5 as the benchmark.  As the CTS-V was just released into production very recently, a more fair comparison will be against the new M5. </p>
<p>By the way, I don&#8217;t mean &#8220;wrinkly skin &#8211; grandma&#8221; old or &#8220;moldy bread&#8221; old, rather the M5 ages gracefully and gets better with age as with fine wine or cheese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Khunaysir</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-157110</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Khunaysir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-157110</guid>
		<description>The M5 is the king of kings ... I have no idea how BMW top it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The M5 is the king of kings &#8230; I have no idea how BMW top it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babken</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-157109</link>
		<dc:creator>Babken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-157109</guid>
		<description>BMW M5 is the Dream Car of all times. CTS-V has an advantage of 49hp, 168lb-ft of additional torque and 1.2litre of additional displacement, but it&#039;s just marginally faster (and only at speeds under 140mph). And for all of that Cadillac engineers needed a full 4 years. I can imagine what will happen when the next generation M5 comes to the ring. CTS-V will be turned to ashes.
Bravo, BMW. Bravo for making such wonderful cars. Bravo for being the most prestigious brand in the world. BRAVO FOR BEING THE BEST!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BMW M5 is the Dream Car of all times. CTS-V has an advantage of 49hp, 168lb-ft of additional torque and 1.2litre of additional displacement, but it&#8217;s just marginally faster (and only at speeds under 140mph). And for all of that Cadillac engineers needed a full 4 years. I can imagine what will happen when the next generation M5 comes to the ring. CTS-V will be turned to ashes.<br />
Bravo, BMW. Bravo for making such wonderful cars. Bravo for being the most prestigious brand in the world. BRAVO FOR BEING THE BEST!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E92-TORONTO</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-157104</link>
		<dc:creator>E92-TORONTO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-157104</guid>
		<description>Who cares, Its still caddy, not the BMW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares, Its still caddy, not the BMW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-157078</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-157078</guid>
		<description>cadillac can enjoy that title for another year or so. let see what happens when bmw introduces over 550 hp and KERS on top of it. so enjoy it while u can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cadillac can enjoy that title for another year or so. let see what happens when bmw introduces over 550 hp and KERS on top of it. so enjoy it while u can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaze</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/10/06/video-and-another-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v/#comment-157046</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=21768#comment-157046</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not really sure what the point of this video was/is.  American muscle generally favours straight line acceleration and speed.

Isn&#039;t it the point of a sports saloon (or cars in general) to also go around corners?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really sure what the point of this video was/is.  American muscle generally favours straight line acceleration and speed.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it the point of a sports saloon (or cars in general) to also go around corners?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

