Comments on: Autozeitung test: BMW M3 vs. Audi TT RS

By: Vitaliy

Vitaliy — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:19:00 +0000

soon we will see !!!

By: Vstasyshyn

Vstasyshyn — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:17:00 +0000

yes bmw is a number one, but audi is a good number two

By: Twining

Twining — Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:45:18 +0000

Opinion; “BMW M3, in our opinion, is the leader in its sport luxury coupe market.”

Fact: AUDI RS5

By: 1Mc

1Mc — Sun, 05 Sep 2010 16:02:50 +0000

The 1M v TTRS v Cayman S will be my most sought after reviews of 2011!

Come on BMW, don’t let us down.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:02:49 +0000

M3 is a legend, but TT-RS is an innovation. Deing ” stick-shift-only” actually add man-instinct to the TT’s feminine culture. but 340 hp and 4.6 give her a pass to the big-boy’s club that used to occupied by guys like M3, Cayman and some Japs..

By: Fast

Fast — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:18:21 +0000

My M3 runs 0-62 in 3.2 seconds, and an 11.00 quarter mile. My car will eat your car for lunch.

Heh.

M3 looks like a plain old car; TT RS looks like something that was designed, not just engineered. Each car is different and shouldn’t be compared, but each car has its strengths and weaknesses.

By: Horatiu B.

Horatiu B. — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:32:03 +0000

A5 is a looker, no doubt, S5 even more, but…that driving experience….not even close. As much as I want Audi to get close to BMW and provide more competition, they are not there yet.

By: Giom

Giom — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:44:50 +0000

My feeling about general E92 opinion is that most people love the looks. Thats why most ppl wanted to see coupe eliments on the sedan. After the E90 facelift, it looked more like E92 – not a bad thing. But the coupe still stands alone in the looks department.

If you want to talk looks… A5. Now there’s a looker.

By: John Pham

John Pham — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:34:31 +0000

Amen to that!

By: Babken

Babken — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:05:14 +0000

0-62 in 5.1 seconds. Th reviewers simply can’t drive a car. M3 runs 0-62 in 4.6 seconds. And on the track it will eat any car for breakfast.

By: Doug

Doug — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:48:25 +0000

Yeah, why are they comparing the TT to the M3? TT=Z4; RS4=M3. Somebody smack them.

I don’t like the new TT… it’s a mismash of design elements; they should have redesigned the TT completely, rather than smoosh R8 elements into the TT’s “cylindrical” core design.

By: ferrarifan

ferrarifan — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:14:27 +0000

@Giom: About looks, to most people, I guess an E92 just looks like an ordinary, beefed up 3 series.. very saloon based look. The RS looks more sports-car”ish”

As for performance though, I still think the E92′s the better car.

By: Giom

Giom — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:12:33 +0000

To me, that end result means nothing. I too, don’t like the TT – not even the new one. (Worse in fotos than in the flesh.) It’s an odly shaped blob that would look good on the bow of an oil tanker – below the water line.

The M3… well, I really don’t have to say anything further.

By: viper

viper — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:44:04 +0000

its not unusual…the cars look similar…although Z4 is a true competitor , I never liked audi TT but this new tts really looks nice!

By: clast

clast — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:32:40 +0000

the tt interior mainly the center console doesn’t look nearly as thought out and the spoiler just looks plain old cheesy…BMW will always be the best in my opinion -_-