<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M Power Balanced: BMW M3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/08/01/m-power-balanced-bmw-m3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/08/01/m-power-balanced-bmw-m3/</link>
	<description>BMW News, Reviews, Test Drives, Photos And Videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bmw Options Decoder</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/08/01/m-power-balanced-bmw-m3/#comment-143815</link>
		<dc:creator>Bmw Options Decoder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=17834#comment-143815</guid>
		<description>I prefer the older m3, e46...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the older m3, e46&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Auday_</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/08/01/m-power-balanced-bmw-m3/#comment-140801</link>
		<dc:creator>_Auday_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 07:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=17834#comment-140801</guid>
		<description>Marc, it&#039;s not about HP and straight line only... M3E92 does the ring in 8:05, M6 in 8:09, and the E92 335i in 8:26. The M3 is tuned to be a sports car while the M6 is just a luxurious car with lots of HP and a great engine. 

I would even go further and say it&#039;s not about numbers and not about beating someone one the straight highway, it&#039;s all about enjoying driving and feeling the car. And for that I would say, IMO, E46M3 is a better sports car than E92M3 although it does the ring in 8:22.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, it&#8217;s not about HP and straight line only&#8230; M3E92 does the ring in 8:05, M6 in 8:09, and the E92 335i in 8:26. The M3 is tuned to be a sports car while the M6 is just a luxurious car with lots of HP and a great engine. </p>
<p>I would even go further and say it&#8217;s not about numbers and not about beating someone one the straight highway, it&#8217;s all about enjoying driving and feeling the car. And for that I would say, IMO, E46M3 is a better sports car than E92M3 although it does the ring in 8:22.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/08/01/m-power-balanced-bmw-m3/#comment-140461</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 04:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=17834#comment-140461</guid>
		<description>Yeah well.....if money were no object and I HAD to choose just ONE....i would still get a M6....it is such a beautiful car. And for me personally the current N54 engined E92 and E82 sit a bit too close to the M3 for comfort (especially considering with a few bolt on mods you are very close to M3 HP and positively killing it in the lb/ft torque department). Just my .02</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah well&#8230;..if money were no object and I HAD to choose just ONE&#8230;.i would still get a M6&#8230;.it is such a beautiful car. And for me personally the current N54 engined E92 and E82 sit a bit too close to the M3 for comfort (especially considering with a few bolt on mods you are very close to M3 HP and positively killing it in the lb/ft torque department). Just my .02</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/08/01/m-power-balanced-bmw-m3/#comment-140279</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 14:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=17834#comment-140279</guid>
		<description>Interesting comparison.  I&#039;ve watched quite a lot of M6s and noticed that on our bumpy baltimore road surfaces, it seems to have a much softer suspension than you&#039;d want on a performance car.   It is well damped, but it doesn&#039;t seem firm enough to deliver the response and feel you&#039;d want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comparison.  I&#8217;ve watched quite a lot of M6s and noticed that on our bumpy baltimore road surfaces, it seems to have a much softer suspension than you&#8217;d want on a performance car.   It is well damped, but it doesn&#8217;t seem firm enough to deliver the response and feel you&#8217;d want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/08/01/m-power-balanced-bmw-m3/#comment-140051</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=17834#comment-140051</guid>
		<description>I very much agree with you. Great write-up!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much agree with you. Great write-up!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: X5 SoB</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/08/01/m-power-balanced-bmw-m3/#comment-139995</link>
		<dc:creator>X5 SoB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=17834#comment-139995</guid>
		<description>Nicely put. The fact is, the previous M5 was more of driver&#039;s car than the current one. The current M3 emulates the previous M5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely put. The fact is, the previous M5 was more of driver&#8217;s car than the current one. The current M3 emulates the previous M5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

