<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: BMW 116d -The cleanest and most economical BMW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/04/30/review-bmw-116d-the-cleanest-and-most-economical-bmw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/04/30/review-bmw-116d-the-cleanest-and-most-economical-bmw/</link>
	<description>BMW News, Reviews, Test Drives, Photos And Videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/04/30/review-bmw-116d-the-cleanest-and-most-economical-bmw/#comment-140053</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=12983#comment-140053</guid>
		<description>If BMW can build a diesel that costs several thousand less than VW, they&#039;ll be busy. It would be nice to have a 2.0/3.0 diesel pick-up available. When will the U.S. wake up and realize we don&#039;t need 6.0 diesels to power our pickup&#039;s? The Hummer could have been a winner had they offered a 3.0 diesel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If BMW can build a diesel that costs several thousand less than VW, they&#8217;ll be busy. It would be nice to have a 2.0/3.0 diesel pick-up available. When will the U.S. wake up and realize we don&#8217;t need 6.0 diesels to power our pickup&#8217;s? The Hummer could have been a winner had they offered a 3.0 diesel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon H</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/04/30/review-bmw-116d-the-cleanest-and-most-economical-bmw/#comment-123298</link>
		<dc:creator>jon H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 22:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=12983#comment-123298</guid>
		<description>a bit to vw golf-ey for me.  even tho i know this would spank a golf :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a bit to vw golf-ey for me.  even tho i know this would spank a golf :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: okeribok</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/04/30/review-bmw-116d-the-cleanest-and-most-economical-bmw/#comment-123203</link>
		<dc:creator>okeribok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=12983#comment-123203</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the &quot;claimed figure&quot; for fuel consumption standardised? Then why mention it at all when that exact figure doesn&#039;t come up when you &quot;drive briskly&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the &#8220;claimed figure&#8221; for fuel consumption standardised? Then why mention it at all when that exact figure doesn&#8217;t come up when you &#8220;drive briskly&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

