<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facelift BMW X5 spotted again &#8211; X6ish front look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/23/facelift-bmw-x5-spotted-again-x6ish-front-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/23/facelift-bmw-x5-spotted-again-x6ish-front-look/</link>
	<description>BMW News, Reviews, Test Drives, Photos And Videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:16:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuesmq</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/23/facelift-bmw-x5-spotted-again-x6ish-front-look/#comment-111214</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesmq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=11078#comment-111214</guid>
		<description>Wonder if the DPC system will be optional on X5 too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder if the DPC system will be optional on X5 too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/23/facelift-bmw-x5-spotted-again-x6ish-front-look/#comment-111179</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=11078#comment-111179</guid>
		<description>Saw a version of  in Oberschleissheim the the other day, it had the same lights as the X6, they looked the same. The mule was not so disguised, just tape around the sites and the front nose.
Back had four exhausts on show, 2 either side. But when checked, 2 of the holes were blanked so was the standard 1 each side in reality</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw a version of  in Oberschleissheim the the other day, it had the same lights as the X6, they looked the same. The mule was not so disguised, just tape around the sites and the front nose.<br />
Back had four exhausts on show, 2 either side. But when checked, 2 of the holes were blanked so was the standard 1 each side in reality</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L1ndja</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/23/facelift-bmw-x5-spotted-again-x6ish-front-look/#comment-111076</link>
		<dc:creator>L1ndja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=11078#comment-111076</guid>
		<description>Expect to see a xdrive50i with the 4.4 Twin Turbo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expect to see a xdrive50i with the 4.4 Twin Turbo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: okeribok</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/23/facelift-bmw-x5-spotted-again-x6ish-front-look/#comment-111052</link>
		<dc:creator>okeribok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=11078#comment-111052</guid>
		<description>As long as it isn&#039;t the GT nose, I&#039;m fine with it. Kinda looks like a fat e46 nose, which isn&#039;t as bad as it sounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as it isn&#8217;t the GT nose, I&#8217;m fine with it. Kinda looks like a fat e46 nose, which isn&#8217;t as bad as it sounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giom</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/23/facelift-bmw-x5-spotted-again-x6ish-front-look/#comment-111014</link>
		<dc:creator>Giom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=11078#comment-111014</guid>
		<description>Is that image for real!? I&#039;d think that the X5 wouldn&#039;t just be a photo copy of the X6. The X6 must stand out.

To me, the X6 front end isn&#039;t nesseseraly better on the X5 (although it is a beautifull design), I quite like the current X5 nose. It&#039;s a little more subtle -wich I think it must be, and its got an identity of its own.

Interesting move this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that image for real!? I&#8217;d think that the X5 wouldn&#8217;t just be a photo copy of the X6. The X6 must stand out.</p>
<p>To me, the X6 front end isn&#8217;t nesseseraly better on the X5 (although it is a beautifull design), I quite like the current X5 nose. It&#8217;s a little more subtle -wich I think it must be, and its got an identity of its own.</p>
<p>Interesting move this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

