<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New updates from BMW Product development &#8211; BMW GT 6, BMW Z2, BMW 3 Series Supersports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/</link>
	<description>BMW News, Reviews, Test Drives, Photos And Videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:30:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Πληθώρα νέων μοντέλων ετοιμάζει η BMW &#124; AutoBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/#comment-207823</link>
		<dc:creator>Πληθώρα νέων μοντέλων ετοιμάζει η BMW &#124; AutoBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=10586#comment-207823</guid>
		<description>[...] [Πηγή: germancarzone, via: bmwblog] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Πηγή: germancarzone, via: bmwblog] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Njave</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/#comment-106936</link>
		<dc:creator>Njave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=10586#comment-106936</guid>
		<description>Everyone these days is producing lot&#039;s of models, they are no different. Just as the market demands, they wouldn&#039;t make them if they didn&#039;t have anyone to seel them to anyway :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone these days is producing lot&#8217;s of models, they are no different. Just as the market demands, they wouldn&#8217;t make them if they didn&#8217;t have anyone to seel them to anyway :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/#comment-106130</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=10586#comment-106130</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-106115&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Matski&lt;/a&gt;: Well, how many models is to many for a brand?  Just considering the models alone, we&#039;ve got 1, x1, z2, 3, x3, m3, z4, 5, 5GT, X5, M5, 6, X6, 6GT, M6, 7.   You&#039;ve got cars (1357), sports cars (24), SUV(1356)s, ok.  But an in-between brand like the PAS confuses what each of these groups are.  It&#039;s really a different vision, a different customer and it doesn&#039;t complement the overall offering.   So I think PAS should be it&#039;s own brand, like Mini.   

Of course people know who makes what, but the point of a brand isn&#039;t to delude people otherwise, I don&#039;t think.   Marketing/advertising might be, but not the brand per se.  Everybody knows that Lexus is a Toyota and/or Nissan (who gives a crap?), but its just as differentiated from the mother brand as it is from the competition.  It&#039;s just... the car&#039;s identity.  It&#039;s a cognitive grouping, by a set of common qualities;  mess with the qualities, you&#039;ve confused the grouping down to what&#039;s still common.  That&#039;s the way I see it, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-106115" rel="nofollow">Matski</a>: Well, how many models is to many for a brand?  Just considering the models alone, we&#8217;ve got 1, x1, z2, 3, x3, m3, z4, 5, 5GT, X5, M5, 6, X6, 6GT, M6, 7.   You&#8217;ve got cars (1357), sports cars (24), SUV(1356)s, ok.  But an in-between brand like the PAS confuses what each of these groups are.  It&#8217;s really a different vision, a different customer and it doesn&#8217;t complement the overall offering.   So I think PAS should be it&#8217;s own brand, like Mini.   </p>
<p>Of course people know who makes what, but the point of a brand isn&#8217;t to delude people otherwise, I don&#8217;t think.   Marketing/advertising might be, but not the brand per se.  Everybody knows that Lexus is a Toyota and/or Nissan (who gives a crap?), but its just as differentiated from the mother brand as it is from the competition.  It&#8217;s just&#8230; the car&#8217;s identity.  It&#8217;s a cognitive grouping, by a set of common qualities;  mess with the qualities, you&#8217;ve confused the grouping down to what&#8217;s still common.  That&#8217;s the way I see it, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matski</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/#comment-106115</link>
		<dc:creator>Matski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=10586#comment-106115</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-106104&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Doug&lt;/a&gt;: I agree in part, what I dont agree with is having more brands with less models in each brand.  Hasn&#039;t worked for the US automakers and it&#039;d fool nobody.... a Mini is still a BMW mini, and a Rolls Royce is still the BMW half of the BMW/VW division of Rolls Royce and Bently Motor Cars.!!! peoples perceoption is sharp enough to get cynical brand engineering... i.e. making a buick from a saturn.

What they need is a strong line-up of cars that outshine the competition in the field of driving dynamics. Small, medium, large.. each segment, every market, bish, bosh, bash, job done! they just got to get each product exctley right for the teeny-tiiny niche they claim for it!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-106104" rel="nofollow">Doug</a>: I agree in part, what I dont agree with is having more brands with less models in each brand.  Hasn&#8217;t worked for the US automakers and it&#8217;d fool nobody&#8230;. a Mini is still a BMW mini, and a Rolls Royce is still the BMW half of the BMW/VW division of Rolls Royce and Bently Motor Cars.!!! peoples perceoption is sharp enough to get cynical brand engineering&#8230; i.e. making a buick from a saturn.</p>
<p>What they need is a strong line-up of cars that outshine the competition in the field of driving dynamics. Small, medium, large.. each segment, every market, bish, bosh, bash, job done! they just got to get each product exctley right for the teeny-tiiny niche they claim for it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/#comment-106104</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=10586#comment-106104</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m starting to get the idea that BMW has lost its way.   There is no clear identity anymore, they just try and introduce as many models as possible  to be everything to everyone.   How do you identify with a brand like that?

Worse, the packages have also lost their meaning.   In sport packages alone you&#039;ve got Sport, Performance, M-Sport, Supersport and also Tii and ///M.   And there&#039;s no real way to know exactly how they differentiate, because the real meat to BMW marketing is in the connotation.

What BMW needs is a separate brand for it&#039;s SUV and PAS vehicles so as to not completely undermine &quot;BMW&quot;.   Then they need fewer models.  Then they need clear variants of those models, and clear packages that are understandable and well-differentiated.  Then throw all other options into the a-la-carte bag and stop trying to &quot;brand&quot; new, poorly differentiated packages at the expense of customers&#039; comprehension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting to get the idea that BMW has lost its way.   There is no clear identity anymore, they just try and introduce as many models as possible  to be everything to everyone.   How do you identify with a brand like that?</p>
<p>Worse, the packages have also lost their meaning.   In sport packages alone you&#8217;ve got Sport, Performance, M-Sport, Supersport and also Tii and ///M.   And there&#8217;s no real way to know exactly how they differentiate, because the real meat to BMW marketing is in the connotation.</p>
<p>What BMW needs is a separate brand for it&#8217;s SUV and PAS vehicles so as to not completely undermine &#8220;BMW&#8221;.   Then they need fewer models.  Then they need clear variants of those models, and clear packages that are understandable and well-differentiated.  Then throw all other options into the a-la-carte bag and stop trying to &#8220;brand&#8221; new, poorly differentiated packages at the expense of customers&#8217; comprehension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gord</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/#comment-105932</link>
		<dc:creator>Gord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=10586#comment-105932</guid>
		<description>The 6 series GT will have a rear door similar to the RX-8.

Why don&#039;t they just make it a foor door coupe like the CLS as opposed to the tiny suicide doors on the RX-8 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 6 series GT will have a rear door similar to the RX-8.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t they just make it a foor door coupe like the CLS as opposed to the tiny suicide doors on the RX-8 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L1ndja</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/#comment-105920</link>
		<dc:creator>L1ndja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=10586#comment-105920</guid>
		<description>No need for this supersports models.Maybe a 1series M version but nothing more not a supersports model of the 3 series.It would be enough to fine tune the 335i to 326hp like in the 7series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No need for this supersports models.Maybe a 1series M version but nothing more not a supersports model of the 3 series.It would be enough to fine tune the 335i to 326hp like in the 7series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gragop</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/#comment-105917</link>
		<dc:creator>Gragop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=10586#comment-105917</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-105913&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Matski&lt;/a&gt;: 
Well, i wish instead of making specific models like a 3 supersports - why not incorporate a package? Something similar to the NISMO kit that came with the 350Z in it&#039;s last two years of production.

I do think it&#039;s silly that for one model line you&#039;ll have 3 cars competing: 

328 vs A4, 335 vs S4, M3 vs RS4. Yes, they technically do different things but they&#039;re the same car underneath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-105913" rel="nofollow">Matski</a>:<br />
Well, i wish instead of making specific models like a 3 supersports &#8211; why not incorporate a package? Something similar to the NISMO kit that came with the 350Z in it&#8217;s last two years of production.</p>
<p>I do think it&#8217;s silly that for one model line you&#8217;ll have 3 cars competing: </p>
<p>328 vs A4, 335 vs S4, M3 vs RS4. Yes, they technically do different things but they&#8217;re the same car underneath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matski</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/#comment-105913</link>
		<dc:creator>Matski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=10586#comment-105913</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-105866&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gragop&lt;/a&gt;: I guess it would give them a more directley comparable rival to A4 - S4 - RS4.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I love the idea of new BMW performance models, but with the various sport packs and performance parts already available its even confusing me sometimes!! and I love all this s**t!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-105866" rel="nofollow">Gragop</a>: I guess it would give them a more directley comparable rival to A4 &#8211; S4 &#8211; RS4.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love the idea of new BMW performance models, but with the various sport packs and performance parts already available its even confusing me sometimes!! and I love all this s**t!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gragop</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/#comment-105866</link>
		<dc:creator>Gragop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=10586#comment-105866</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-105830&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Matski&lt;/a&gt;: This tells you that M car prices are going to continue to sky rocket up if they feel the need to add a &quot;sport&quot; model between the standard 3 and M3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-105830" rel="nofollow">Matski</a>: This tells you that M car prices are going to continue to sky rocket up if they feel the need to add a &#8220;sport&#8221; model between the standard 3 and M3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matski</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/#comment-105830</link>
		<dc:creator>Matski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=10586#comment-105830</guid>
		<description>Yeah I&#039;m not sure where this supersport model is supposed to fit in... okay so they&#039;ll make a 1-er supersport because there is no M version, but I assume there will still be an M3, so a supersport.. is there really a need?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I&#8217;m not sure where this supersport model is supposed to fit in&#8230; okay so they&#8217;ll make a 1-er supersport because there is no M version, but I assume there will still be an M3, so a supersport.. is there really a need?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuxl</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/#comment-105829</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuxl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=10586#comment-105829</guid>
		<description>M1 like? Or did you mean series 1 M like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M1 like? Or did you mean series 1 M like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkp</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/03/09/new-updates-from-bmw-product-development/#comment-105818</link>
		<dc:creator>jkp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=10586#comment-105818</guid>
		<description>Again, BMW needs to drop the Chevrolet &quot;Supersport&quot; moniker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, BMW needs to drop the Chevrolet &#8220;Supersport&#8221; moniker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

