<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Autobild first to drive the BMW X6M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/</link>
	<description>News And Rumors Covering The Auto Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: e92-toronto</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-164951</link>
		<dc:creator>e92-toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-164951</guid>
		<description>OMG THIS THEREAD BACK AGAIN LOL LOL

17.12.2008 POST DATE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG THIS THEREAD BACK AGAIN LOL LOL</p>
<p>17.12.2008 POST DATE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-164949</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-164949</guid>
		<description>Will BMW Make X6 4.8. The current X6 4.4 is find by me but i need to know before i buy one if there will be X6 4.8 because the 4.8 is a full option with additional cost.

Please inform me via email.
Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will BMW Make X6 4.8. The current X6 4.4 is find by me but i need to know before i buy one if there will be X6 4.8 because the 4.8 is a full option with additional cost.</p>
<p>Please inform me via email.<br />
Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clara</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-77670</link>
		<dc:creator>clara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-77670</guid>
		<description>Sorry Hotariu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Hotariu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clara</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-77669</link>
		<dc:creator>clara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-77669</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-77601&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gragop&lt;/a&gt;: 
You should ask Hotatiu if you can do some editorials... they&#039;d be amusing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-77601" rel="nofollow">Gragop</a>:<br />
You should ask Hotatiu if you can do some editorials&#8230; they&#8217;d be amusing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gragop</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-77601</link>
		<dc:creator>Gragop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-77601</guid>
		<description>The complete lack of BMW core in these vehicles makes me vomit in my mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The complete lack of BMW core in these vehicles makes me vomit in my mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AutoBild conduce el futuro BMW X6 M : Blogografia</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-77278</link>
		<dc:creator>AutoBild conduce el futuro BMW X6 M : Blogografia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-77278</guid>
		<description>[...] bmwblog, autoblog.it En Diariomotor: Presente y futuro de BMW Motorsport, BMW X6, fotos oficiales y nuevos [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bmwblog, autoblog.it En Diariomotor: Presente y futuro de BMW Motorsport, BMW X6, fotos oficiales y nuevos [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-77265</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-77265</guid>
		<description>I own and M5 and this would make an ultimate winter ride.  WOOHOO!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own and M5 and this would make an ultimate winter ride.  WOOHOO!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AutoBild conduce el futuro BMW X6 M &#8212; Diariomotor</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-77256</link>
		<dc:creator>AutoBild conduce el futuro BMW X6 M &#8212; Diariomotor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-77256</guid>
		<description>[...] bmwblog, autoblog.it En Diariomotor: Presente y futuro de BMW Motorsport, BMW X6, fotos oficiales y nuevos [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bmwblog, autoblog.it En Diariomotor: Presente y futuro de BMW Motorsport, BMW X6, fotos oficiales y nuevos [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solrac_x81</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-77255</link>
		<dc:creator>Solrac_x81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-77255</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-77231&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Giom&lt;/a&gt;: 
I think your rigth and BMW is making the rigth moves 

btw the porsche cayenne Turbo S is a Kickass performer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-77231" rel="nofollow">Giom</a>:<br />
I think your rigth and BMW is making the rigth moves </p>
<p>btw the porsche cayenne Turbo S is a Kickass performer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giom</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-77231</link>
		<dc:creator>Giom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-77231</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-77217&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gragop&lt;/a&gt;: 

I believe the 3,000+ Mustang variants was a result of playing it safe. And the new one is no different. It&#039;s the same looking thing. If they wanted Mustang to be what it once was, they shouldn&#039;t have looked to the past, but to the future. And that&#039;s what BMW does great. Sure it takes us longer to get to terms with it, but soon everybody follows.

Look at all the car companies that didn&#039;t &#039;sell their soul&#039; for profits, they don&#039;t exist anymore (or at least are owned by some foreign investors). The secret is balance. Porshe got it right, BMW got it right, to name just a few. All British makers got it wrong, most American companies got it wrong.

I think we should lay off with the soul selling allegations and be thankfull there are still companies that build great cars while making a profit. The purist might never like it, but at least we might never see an Indian owner taking the reigns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-77217" rel="nofollow">Gragop</a>: </p>
<p>I believe the 3,000+ Mustang variants was a result of playing it safe. And the new one is no different. It&#8217;s the same looking thing. If they wanted Mustang to be what it once was, they shouldn&#8217;t have looked to the past, but to the future. And that&#8217;s what BMW does great. Sure it takes us longer to get to terms with it, but soon everybody follows.</p>
<p>Look at all the car companies that didn&#8217;t &#8217;sell their soul&#8217; for profits, they don&#8217;t exist anymore (or at least are owned by some foreign investors). The secret is balance. Porshe got it right, BMW got it right, to name just a few. All British makers got it wrong, most American companies got it wrong.</p>
<p>I think we should lay off with the soul selling allegations and be thankfull there are still companies that build great cars while making a profit. The purist might never like it, but at least we might never see an Indian owner taking the reigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gragop</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-77217</link>
		<dc:creator>Gragop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-77217</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-77137&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Solrac_x81&lt;/a&gt;: 

Yeah and Porsche sold it&#039;s soul to be the most profitable car company in the world. That tells me one thing: their focus is profits not performance cars. When, in the history of the car industry, has focusing on profits not come back to bite a manufacturer in the ass? Look at Ford with it&#039;s 3,000 variations of the Mustang - trying to find new ways to keep sales up by producing assinine products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-77137" rel="nofollow">Solrac_x81</a>: </p>
<p>Yeah and Porsche sold it&#8217;s soul to be the most profitable car company in the world. That tells me one thing: their focus is profits not performance cars. When, in the history of the car industry, has focusing on profits not come back to bite a manufacturer in the ass? Look at Ford with it&#8217;s 3,000 variations of the Mustang &#8211; trying to find new ways to keep sales up by producing assinine products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matski</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-77195</link>
		<dc:creator>Matski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-77195</guid>
		<description>I hope their guesstimate of 550hp turns out to be true, I think this beast will need every last little pony to drag it&#039;s big ass round the &#039;ring that fast!

550hp from a Twin Turbo V8 is pretty good, I did like the idea of a Twin Turbo V10 more though.... give the V10 a decent send-off before the V10 E60/E63&#039;s disappear.

I&#039;m not stunned about the idea of M SAV&#039;s &amp; SAC&#039;s, but as long as it does out perform it&#039;s rivals in terms of driving dynamics then it still holds the tradition of M, even if not the traditional philosophy and engineering... a 5000lb 4WD Turbo M car... &#039;tis indeed a strange new world!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope their guesstimate of 550hp turns out to be true, I think this beast will need every last little pony to drag it&#8217;s big ass round the &#8216;ring that fast!</p>
<p>550hp from a Twin Turbo V8 is pretty good, I did like the idea of a Twin Turbo V10 more though&#8230;. give the V10 a decent send-off before the V10 E60/E63&#8217;s disappear.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not stunned about the idea of M SAV&#8217;s &amp; SAC&#8217;s, but as long as it does out perform it&#8217;s rivals in terms of driving dynamics then it still holds the tradition of M, even if not the traditional philosophy and engineering&#8230; a 5000lb 4WD Turbo M car&#8230; &#8217;tis indeed a strange new world!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solrac_x81</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-77137</link>
		<dc:creator>Solrac_x81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-77137</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-76979&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gragop&lt;/a&gt;: 

Porsche did the same with the cayenne and see how that turn out 
I think it will be the same with the X5M and the X6M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-76979" rel="nofollow">Gragop</a>: </p>
<p>Porsche did the same with the cayenne and see how that turn out<br />
I think it will be the same with the X5M and the X6M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clara</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-77103</link>
		<dc:creator>clara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-77103</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to say what they meant about 550hp, it&#039;s so weirdly translated:  &quot;That sounds like about 550 hp&quot; is maybe speculation?   Who knows.   It&#039;s Klecker, man, but Klotz!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to say what they meant about 550hp, it&#8217;s so weirdly translated:  &#8220;That sounds like about 550 hp&#8221; is maybe speculation?   Who knows.   It&#8217;s Klecker, man, but Klotz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gragop</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-76979</link>
		<dc:creator>Gragop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-76979</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-76975&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;E92-TORONTO&lt;/a&gt;: Did what again? Make an abomination against what M Division supposedly stood for?

I&#039;m sure in market-ready guise this vehicle will be fast. However, aren&#039;t test mules typically tuned much higher in terms of HP and torque than the production models have? Wasn&#039;t the E60 M5 tuned to something like 550 to 600HP before being reeled back to 507HP for the production cars?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-76975" rel="nofollow">E92-TORONTO</a>: Did what again? Make an abomination against what M Division supposedly stood for?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure in market-ready guise this vehicle will be fast. However, aren&#8217;t test mules typically tuned much higher in terms of HP and torque than the production models have? Wasn&#8217;t the E60 M5 tuned to something like 550 to 600HP before being reeled back to 507HP for the production cars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E92-TORONTO</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/12/17/autobild-first-to-drive-the-bmw-x6m/comment-page-1/#comment-76975</link>
		<dc:creator>E92-TORONTO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=6874#comment-76975</guid>
		<description>BMW DID IT AGAIN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BMW DID IT AGAIN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
