Which car should get is the question? My cousin has the option of getting a 2005 BMW M3, with low miles, or for about $2,000 more, he can get a 2007 BMW 335i Coupe.
If you were in his shoes, which one would you get and most important, why? I personally think the 335 is a better choice because the insurance is cheaper, they both go from 0-60 in about the same amount of time and the 335i gets better gas mileage and it has a new body style.
My cousin on the other hand said that the M3 holds a better name.
Article By CARversation.com
22 Responses
Gragop
October 10th, 2008 at 11:22 pm
1I face the same problem in the next few months. Personally, I say the M3. I think that in 20 years, the E46 M3 will be seen as the car to be had as it was the last of the BMW’s to really engross the driver. It will also possibly be the last (I’m guessing here) six cylinder, naturally aspirated engines from M division.
Seriously, is there a BMW fan out there who doesn’t love the E46 M3 CSL? That’s one of my all-time favorites. To me, the M3 defines a lot of what BMW was pre-late 2005/2006.
Javier
October 10th, 2008 at 11:55 pm
22005 M3 FTW. The 2007 one has the new body, which is, IMHO, a royal POS.
If you are considering an M3 or a 335 then for certain gas mileage is not a parameter.
About that E9X fugly body… I know, I know. It’s a matter of taste, so there really isn’t a truly objective reasoning in this whole issue.
GabsoN
October 11th, 2008 at 3:44 am
3I would get the m3, because it is M3… But 335i is more iconomical and it is new - it will have guarantee.
And one more thing, if i wanted to get the newest 3 series coupe, i would wait for the facelift.
L1ndja
October 11th, 2008 at 4:29 am
4This is a really uncomfortably position lol well i dont have the money for either but if i had to choose between an M3 05 and en 335i07 i would choose the 335i over the M3.OK, you might think im gay but im not i absolutely love the M3 it is one of the best cars ever made but with new laws coming in soon the M3 would cost you much more and it also is less fuel efficient oh and i forgot something is the 335i a sedan or a coupe???cause if it is a sedan dont get it.It absolutely sucks i would rather pay more on taxes and fuel than have that shit…It doesnt deserve the name of the ultimate driving machine “BMW”
Amr Maranello
October 11th, 2008 at 5:44 am
5I will Choose BMW ///M3 2005 it’s the better in design ,shape and performance .. I adore it
JakeC
October 11th, 2008 at 6:59 am
6I would go for the M3 only if it was CPO with a warranty. While I agree the M3 is a classic and has a certain aura about it. It will cause problems and go to the shop. And unless your pocketbook is fat you don’t want to be paying that repair bill. So if the M3 is not a CPO I would go with the 335i coupe provided the 335i coupe was CPO with a warranty.
- J
Hantra
October 11th, 2008 at 9:06 am
7Take both of them into a tunnel and roll all the windows down. That’s an easy decision.
I agree with a previous poster on waiting for the facelift if he wants an E92.
okeribok
October 11th, 2008 at 10:55 am
8For you: take the M3. For me: I’ll take the 335.
This basically means that the M3 has more heart, but the 335 makes more sense. Personally, I drive an E46 compact diesel and I think that there is no BMW for me in the current lineup: a 3 series hatch, with somewhat individual styling.
Joe
October 11th, 2008 at 11:27 am
9M3 hands down. Looks better and those rims are nuts.
Gragop
October 11th, 2008 at 12:04 pm
10If I had much deeper pockets I’d do everything in my power to snatch up a CSL and import it. Federalizing a CSL might be a wee bit difficult though.
Marek Javorek
October 11th, 2008 at 2:16 pm
11Dude get the M3,Its not only about the 0-60 Times that are similar.But the M is tuned to be more responsive and to have better performacne overall.
Donny
October 11th, 2008 at 9:08 pm
12No, no, no … lets not kid ourselves here. Get the 335i, and don’t think twice about it. The engine is superior, and the body is more refined, more modern, and just more bitchin’!
whatever
October 12th, 2008 at 3:04 pm
13335 FTW!! drop a huge turbo in there with all the supporting mods and you can double your HP.
Eric
October 12th, 2008 at 5:43 pm
14Depends on how he uses it. I had a 2002 E46 M3 and traded it last year for a 335i coupe manual. I commute 40 miles a day in LA traffic, and the 335, like one of the comments above, makes more “sense” as a daily driver. I LOVED my M3, but I knew the new E92 M3 was just too much car with the V8 - weight, low fuel economy, etc. In everyday driving, the 335 is as fast as the M3. But it obviously lacks the “edge” and grunt and hard-edged nature of the M3. If this is a weekend car that he’s going to covet and polish and tear up mountain roads in, absolutely the M3. It’s more fun, where the 335 is more rational. He needs to consider maintenance costs on M3 however - out of warranty it is costly to maintain.
Auday
October 12th, 2008 at 9:09 pm
15I faced exactly the same question 5 months ago, and after driving both cars the answer was sooo easy, E46 M3 Competition Package was my car. The E92 335i is fast and has crazy torque, but that’s not what a real BMW enthusiast look for, what we want is a car that makes you feel part of it and make you smile with each turn you take.
P.S: my car is a 2006 E46 M3 Comp Package 6spd manual Carbon black with Cinnamon interior, a gorgeous one!
Lee
October 13th, 2008 at 10:27 am
16E46 M3, without a doubt. While the 335 is a great car and not a bad option, there’s more to the M3 than what you’re going to see by comparing 0-60 times.
Being a former e46 M3 owner and having the chance to drive many 335s at work, neither are bad options. My money still goes to the e46 M3, though.
Redwood
October 13th, 2008 at 10:27 am
17As much as I love the M3, I would say go for the 335. I think the 335 coupe is gorgeous (so is the M3). I wouldn’t say a person considering both vehicles doesn’t care about gas mileage at all. The 335 gets decent gas mileage, the M3 doesn’t. The insurance difference is probably not that huge. Even regular BMWs have high insurance rates (speaking from having owned regular an M BMWs). However, the repair costs are a lot higher on the M3 and if you’ve watched Edmunds’ experiece with a 2002 long-term M3, there are quite a few issues that will come up in the next few years at great expense. However, if it’s not too late to get an extended warranty on the M3, that might make that a non-issue for a while.
Clara
October 13th, 2008 at 1:53 pm
18It’s interesting — and surprising — to read the comments here. To me, the M3 wins because of it’s obviously superior handling. It’s a lower, smaller car, and has a better tuned suspension. The E92 to me insulates the driver too much from the interaction of car and road in the interests of being a luxury car and other silly distractions (eg, run-flats). It is less responsive, and the subtle road changes are less communicated. Naturally, both are still excellent, but it depends on what you’re focused on.
Lee
October 13th, 2008 at 2:29 pm
19Maintenence costs are only marginally higher with the M3 (once they are both out of BMW’s included free maintenence). The main differences being that the M3 calls for more expensive fluid in the diff and will need valve shims ever 60k miles.
Perhaps I’m missing something else here, but beyond those two differences they’re pretty much going to require the same things. The 335 might even come with slightly higher labor times (maybe) due to having more stuff crammed in the engine bay. Honestly I haven’t done much major work on them yet for me to really say for sure. When we see them it’s typically for an oil/filter, CEL or track inspection. Once they start to fall out of warranty, that’ll change pretty quickly.
You really can’t go wrong with those two options, though. Kinda like having to choose between a bottle of Chimay or Maredsous. Neither are going to leave you disappointed.
Volan
October 13th, 2008 at 5:39 pm
20I dont know any BMWs that can/should be judged by the 0-60: if thats your goal, you are barking to the wrong tree altogether- get anything american with muscle. I will let you decide by following that link:
http://blogs.edmunds.com/straightline/2008/04/comparison-test-2002-bmw-m3-vs-2008-bmw-135i-vs-2008-bmw-335i.html
Volan
October 13th, 2008 at 5:45 pm
21Let me also add that I never had/seen a 0-60 more than 5.2 sec for the M3- so dont know how that driver managed to get a 5.4…..
Alessandro
October 14th, 2008 at 12:42 pm
22Hey guys, this is my 335 in front of my house i was surprised that they took this picture.
Enjoy
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Categories
Top 10 Articles
Recent Comments
Featured Stories
Recent Entries
Recent Comments
Information