<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMW X6 M &#8211; almost ready</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/22/bmw-x6-m-almost-ready/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/22/bmw-x6-m-almost-ready/</link>
	<description>BMW News, Reviews, Test Drives, Photos And Videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumor: No future BMW Z4 M?</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/22/bmw-x6-m-almost-ready/#comment-268128</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumor: No future BMW Z4 M?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=2683#comment-268128</guid>
		<description>[...] of axing the Z4 M, but it also places a big question mark next to the upcoming BMW X5 M and X6 M. Sure, BMW has approved these models at least a couple of years back, so this could explain the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of axing the Z4 M, but it also places a big question mark next to the upcoming BMW X5 M and X6 M. Sure, BMW has approved these models at least a couple of years back, so this could explain the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

