<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spy Photos: BMW PAS &#8211; still don&#8217;t see the point of it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/07/spy-photos-bmw-pas-still-dont-see-the-point-of-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/07/spy-photos-bmw-pas-still-dont-see-the-point-of-it/</link>
	<description>News And Rumors Covering The Auto Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gragop</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/07/spy-photos-bmw-pas-still-dont-see-the-point-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-52142</link>
		<dc:creator>Gragop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=2315#comment-52142</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-52137&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Speedoholic&lt;/a&gt;: 

The X1 is already slated to be a different, smaller SUV. This will probably be some sort of 5 derivative or it&#039;ll have some new prefix. There were rumors for a while that  this model would be named V1 or V5 or something along those lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-52137" rel="nofollow">Speedoholic</a>: </p>
<p>The X1 is already slated to be a different, smaller SUV. This will probably be some sort of 5 derivative or it&#8217;ll have some new prefix. There were rumors for a while that  this model would be named V1 or V5 or something along those lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedoholic</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/07/spy-photos-bmw-pas-still-dont-see-the-point-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-52137</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedoholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=2315#comment-52137</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s gonna be named X1 cz 1 is the smallest number and this car is crossover so X1 would be perfect for it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s gonna be named X1 cz 1 is the smallest number and this car is crossover so X1 would be perfect for it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giom</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/07/spy-photos-bmw-pas-still-dont-see-the-point-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-52124</link>
		<dc:creator>Giom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=2315#comment-52124</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-52117&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gragop&lt;/a&gt;: 

Why the hell do they produce the PAS but they won’t produce the M1 Homage car or the 328 Coupe(pre-war retro car concept)?!

Now that&#039;s a question! Not the 328 maybe, but the M1 definitely.

Do you really think the 8 was ever intended to go up against a Ferrari? I never got that idea. A grand tourer is how BMW defined it, and that&#039;s what it was. The perception maybe was for it to be compared with some Ferrari-type sports cars, just because it looked so damn good.

I&#039;ll keep my judgement on the PAS till its been selling for a few months, but till then I&#039;ll support the efforts of the BMW guys and gals and wish for them success with this model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-52117" rel="nofollow">Gragop</a>: </p>
<p>Why the hell do they produce the PAS but they won’t produce the M1 Homage car or the 328 Coupe(pre-war retro car concept)?!</p>
<p>Now that&#8217;s a question! Not the 328 maybe, but the M1 definitely.</p>
<p>Do you really think the 8 was ever intended to go up against a Ferrari? I never got that idea. A grand tourer is how BMW defined it, and that&#8217;s what it was. The perception maybe was for it to be compared with some Ferrari-type sports cars, just because it looked so damn good.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep my judgement on the PAS till its been selling for a few months, but till then I&#8217;ll support the efforts of the BMW guys and gals and wish for them success with this model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gragop</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/07/spy-photos-bmw-pas-still-dont-see-the-point-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-52117</link>
		<dc:creator>Gragop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=2315#comment-52117</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the 8 Series was largely considered a failure. But part of the problem was BMW picked a bad market to compete in before they fully developed the reputation they have today. If BMW built that now it would be a huge hit - but in 1990 BMW building a car to compete with a Ferrari seems a bit silly - too bad we didn&#039;t see a true M8 versus the 850CSi. But that car had a purpose - to fight a Ferrari or Porsche while still remaining a comfortable GT car. 

The PAS doesn&#039;t really have a purpose. Who&#039;s it taking on? Why? Why isn&#039;t a 5 Series wagon sufficient? If that&#039;s the case, buy an X5 - they&#039;re in the ballpark of each other in terms of price. I feel like this will be product of BMW&#039;s marketing team versus BMW finding true functionality and need in the marketplace for this car. I expect BMW to be revolutionary not a trending-riding company and the PAS seems to have that feeling about it. 

Why the hell do they produce the PAS but they won&#039;t produce the M1 Homage car or the 328 Coupe(pre-war retro car concept)?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the 8 Series was largely considered a failure. But part of the problem was BMW picked a bad market to compete in before they fully developed the reputation they have today. If BMW built that now it would be a huge hit &#8211; but in 1990 BMW building a car to compete with a Ferrari seems a bit silly &#8211; too bad we didn&#8217;t see a true M8 versus the 850CSi. But that car had a purpose &#8211; to fight a Ferrari or Porsche while still remaining a comfortable GT car. </p>
<p>The PAS doesn&#8217;t really have a purpose. Who&#8217;s it taking on? Why? Why isn&#8217;t a 5 Series wagon sufficient? If that&#8217;s the case, buy an X5 &#8211; they&#8217;re in the ballpark of each other in terms of price. I feel like this will be product of BMW&#8217;s marketing team versus BMW finding true functionality and need in the marketplace for this car. I expect BMW to be revolutionary not a trending-riding company and the PAS seems to have that feeling about it. </p>
<p>Why the hell do they produce the PAS but they won&#8217;t produce the M1 Homage car or the 328 Coupe(pre-war retro car concept)?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/07/spy-photos-bmw-pas-still-dont-see-the-point-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-52109</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=2315#comment-52109</guid>
		<description>This car is not a original design.Renault has been using this design for their Laguna. The PAS uses the same platform as the 5 series then why would anyone buy this car?For space, I&#039; d rather buy the 5 series Touring. Don&#039;t tell me that station wagons don&#039;t sell well in the US because hatchbacks don&#039;t sell either!
Send Adrian van Hooydonk back to the Orange land please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This car is not a original design.Renault has been using this design for their Laguna. The PAS uses the same platform as the 5 series then why would anyone buy this car?For space, I&#8217; d rather buy the 5 series Touring. Don&#8217;t tell me that station wagons don&#8217;t sell well in the US because hatchbacks don&#8217;t sell either!<br />
Send Adrian van Hooydonk back to the Orange land please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giom</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/07/spy-photos-bmw-pas-still-dont-see-the-point-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-52103</link>
		<dc:creator>Giom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=2315#comment-52103</guid>
		<description>I see ya&#039;ll point. But hear me out.

We don&#039;t know where BMW is going with this. Obviously they&#039;ve done research and is building a nich with a slot in their line-up. Now, this poor product is receiving the worst publicity before it&#039;s able to being understood or explain itself. So, in thousends of minds - including those this car is aimed at, this car is already a failure. Perceptions are powerfull!

I believe the 8-series was a victim of poor perception. Think about this. That car was researched and build with a specific market in mind. The only perceptions we got, were those from the press that drove it. The 8 was never build for them - they didn&#039;t understand its purpose or its market. It got the worst revues ever, which scared off the people that it was aimed at. Today it&#039;s still perceived as a BMW failure.

Don&#039;t sink the ship before it leaves the harbour!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see ya&#8217;ll point. But hear me out.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t know where BMW is going with this. Obviously they&#8217;ve done research and is building a nich with a slot in their line-up. Now, this poor product is receiving the worst publicity before it&#8217;s able to being understood or explain itself. So, in thousends of minds &#8211; including those this car is aimed at, this car is already a failure. Perceptions are powerfull!</p>
<p>I believe the 8-series was a victim of poor perception. Think about this. That car was researched and build with a specific market in mind. The only perceptions we got, were those from the press that drove it. The 8 was never build for them &#8211; they didn&#8217;t understand its purpose or its market. It got the worst revues ever, which scared off the people that it was aimed at. Today it&#8217;s still perceived as a BMW failure.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t sink the ship before it leaves the harbour!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gragop</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/07/spy-photos-bmw-pas-still-dont-see-the-point-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-52067</link>
		<dc:creator>Gragop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=2315#comment-52067</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t see the utilities this car can provide. As Horatiu B said, the X5 added a product into BMW&#039;s line up that it needed to compete with Mercedes and other brands. It seems that the PAS is either creating a niche that isn&#039;t needed or trying to compete with the R Class, which as noted above, failed.

I love BMW but seriously, tell me what this thing does for their lineup in terms of adding value?  This is just like when MB created the CLS as a stop-gap between the S class, E class and CLK. &quot;Oh yes! I&#039;d love a sedan smaller than an S class, bigger than an E class but looks a little like a XCLK coupe but isn&#039;t!&quot; Sorry - but the same sort of logic prevails on this car. 

Considering the trend BMW has been on and is on for the last 30 years they&#039;ve done pretty damn good with their lineup with very few failures. I even liked their failures! (Read M1, 318ti, 8 Series).

Just because someone doesn&#039;t like a design of BMW doesn&#039;t mean they&#039;re some closed-minded jackass that rejects anything new beyond a certain point. I&#039;m a BMW nut but it doesn&#039;t mean I&#039;m going to buy into every model they make just because it&#039;s a BMW - they do make mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t see the utilities this car can provide. As Horatiu B said, the X5 added a product into BMW&#8217;s line up that it needed to compete with Mercedes and other brands. It seems that the PAS is either creating a niche that isn&#8217;t needed or trying to compete with the R Class, which as noted above, failed.</p>
<p>I love BMW but seriously, tell me what this thing does for their lineup in terms of adding value?  This is just like when MB created the CLS as a stop-gap between the S class, E class and CLK. &#8220;Oh yes! I&#8217;d love a sedan smaller than an S class, bigger than an E class but looks a little like a XCLK coupe but isn&#8217;t!&#8221; Sorry &#8211; but the same sort of logic prevails on this car. </p>
<p>Considering the trend BMW has been on and is on for the last 30 years they&#8217;ve done pretty damn good with their lineup with very few failures. I even liked their failures! (Read M1, 318ti, 8 Series).</p>
<p>Just because someone doesn&#8217;t like a design of BMW doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re some closed-minded jackass that rejects anything new beyond a certain point. I&#8217;m a BMW nut but it doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m going to buy into every model they make just because it&#8217;s a BMW &#8211; they do make mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horatiu B.</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/07/spy-photos-bmw-pas-still-dont-see-the-point-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-52065</link>
		<dc:creator>Horatiu B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=2315#comment-52065</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Giom:&lt;/p&gt;
This is different Giom. When the X5 came out, there was no other bimmer in the same market, or near it. I have always supported BMW and I shared their vision. I was even a huge supporter of the X6 and still am. I absolutely loved the E46, but when the E9x came out, I did not look back, nor bash it. 

But this time, the PAS just doesn&#039;t have a huge market to tap in and it overlaps with the 5 Wagon. If the price will be in the same range, it will be even worse. Remember, you cannot always get it right, and there are plenty examples to show, including MB R-Class, which failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Giom:</p>
<p>This is different Giom. When the X5 came out, there was no other bimmer in the same market, or near it. I have always supported BMW and I shared their vision. I was even a huge supporter of the X6 and still am. I absolutely loved the E46, but when the E9x came out, I did not look back, nor bash it. </p>
<p>But this time, the PAS just doesn&#8217;t have a huge market to tap in and it overlaps with the 5 Wagon. If the price will be in the same range, it will be even worse. Remember, you cannot always get it right, and there are plenty examples to show, including MB R-Class, which failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giom</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/07/spy-photos-bmw-pas-still-dont-see-the-point-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-52064</link>
		<dc:creator>Giom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=2315#comment-52064</guid>
		<description>Yea, you guys are right. BMW should get stale, stagnate... do the same thing year after year - never do something new. 

Funny, it reminds me of the british motor industry - look at them now.

Forgive the frustration. But I&#039;m sick of hearing how BMW is building pointless cars. I bet a lot of you guys said the same thing when the first X5 came out. Look at where it is today! Couple of years on, you&#039;ll probably own one of these cars (X6 or PAS). Long forgotten about it&#039;s uselessness. By that time you&#039;ll be shooting down the newest products cause thy&#039;re breaking new ground.

Are you truly this scared of something new? Change is a part of life friends, get used to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, you guys are right. BMW should get stale, stagnate&#8230; do the same thing year after year &#8211; never do something new. </p>
<p>Funny, it reminds me of the british motor industry &#8211; look at them now.</p>
<p>Forgive the frustration. But I&#8217;m sick of hearing how BMW is building pointless cars. I bet a lot of you guys said the same thing when the first X5 came out. Look at where it is today! Couple of years on, you&#8217;ll probably own one of these cars (X6 or PAS). Long forgotten about it&#8217;s uselessness. By that time you&#8217;ll be shooting down the newest products cause thy&#8217;re breaking new ground.</p>
<p>Are you truly this scared of something new? Change is a part of life friends, get used to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gragop</title>
		<link>http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/08/07/spy-photos-bmw-pas-still-dont-see-the-point-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-52057</link>
		<dc:creator>Gragop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmwblog.com/?p=2315#comment-52057</guid>
		<description>Agreed. This vehicle is pointless. This is in same useless vein as the X6. The only upshot of the PAS is that it will probably give us a moderatly good idea as to what the next  5 series will look like.

For my money I&#039;d take a 5 Series Touring rather than have some sort of weird psuedo-hatchback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. This vehicle is pointless. This is in same useless vein as the X6. The only upshot of the PAS is that it will probably give us a moderatly good idea as to what the next  5 series will look like.</p>
<p>For my money I&#8217;d take a 5 Series Touring rather than have some sort of weird psuedo-hatchback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
