BMW BLOG

18 Responses to “BMW X6 vs Porsche Cayenne vs Range Rover Sport”

1. Update on the BMW X6 Diesel Engines says:

   January 21, 2008 at 6:27 pm

   [...] we posted our last article on the BMW X6, we have received many emails inquiring about the diesel engines that will be available on the X6. [...]

   Reply
2. Scott VanPala says:

   January 22, 2008 at 11:38 pm

   These charts are comparing apples and oranges. The BMW is NOT a proper offroader. Critically, it lacks a low range case, locking differentials, and height adjustment that the Porsche and Rover have. The BMW would get stuck on a golf course. Compare it to other crossovers and grass and gravel SUV’s like the Jeep SRT8 and the Infiniti FX and the Mercedes ML63 and you will be less impressed with the bimmer.

   Reply
3. BMW Blog » Blog Archive » Leaked BMW Competitive Analysis Gives Peek at Diesel Options [Leaky] says:

   January 23, 2008 at 7:30 am

   [...] fishy just leaked onto the Bimmer-centric site edBMW. It’s a supposedly leaked document that compares the freshly unveiled BMW X6, Porsche [...]

   Reply
4. Brand New Photos With The BMW X6 says:

   January 28, 2008 at 4:24 pm

   [...] a previous post earlier last week, we showed you a comparison between the X6, the Porsche Cayenne and the Range Rover Sport. In all the categories, the X6 won without any doubt. So, I am asking you, all the bimmer fans or [...]

   Reply
5. Speed Racer says:

   February 11, 2008 at 5:22 pm

   This is a ridiculous comparison. Of-course the 6 is going to win on roads. The PC should fair better and if the appropriate model were here would. The RRS is an off road truck, not a street racer. Stick a 6 next to a RRS on the side of a mountain and lets see the results. Notice the didn’t include the X5? What a joke.

   Reply
6. BMW Hybrid X6 coming in 2009 says:

   April 4, 2008 at 8:54 pm

   [...] first cars next week, so they should be available for driving. As we have reported in the past, the BMW X6 seems to be an amazing pierce of technology and the initial test drives were very encouraging. Some [...]

   Reply
7. BMW X6 EPA numbers says:

   April 22, 2008 at 8:35 am

   [...] The BMW X6 has reached man U.S dealerships already and many test drives have been performed. The fuel consumption was one thing that all these reports were lacking. Back in January, we have posted a comparison between the BMW X6, Porsche Cayenne and Range Rover Sport. [...]

   Reply
8. Elclair says:

   May 8, 2008 at 5:57 am

   This is an uneducated comparision, the BMW Xdrive50i has a Twin-Turbo charged engine while the Porsche GTS is naturally aspirated, the BMW’s have no off-road capability besides its ground clearance. Compare the Xdrive50i with the Cayenne Turbo (which is comparing apples with apples since both are twin turbo V8’s) and the X6 will get decimated in EVERY apsect. The X6 is nothing more than a raised, over-glorified, stationwagon.

   Reply
9. BMW X6: SOLD OUT ! says:

   May 8, 2008 at 9:54 am

   [...] until the X6 xDrive50 hits the showrooms….Do you remember the article I have posted about BMW X6 vs Porsche Cayenne and Range Rover ? It was based on an internal BMW document which compared the above cars head-to-head. The article [...]

   Reply
10. ilirjajn says:

    June 8, 2008 at 3:16 am

    tung si je

    Reply
11. Wrong info!! says:

    July 14, 2008 at 1:13 pm

    Cayenne 0-60 : 7.5sec not 8.1
    GTS : 5.7sec not 6.1
    don’t lower others to gain self asteam=]
    not to mention results compared off-road

    Reply
12. Wrong info!!2 says:

    July 14, 2008 at 1:26 pm

    guess what, found more
    X6 xDrive35i 0-60 : 6.9 not 6.7
    X6 xDrive50i : 5.6 not 5.4
    info from both maker’s offical site

    Reply
13. Horatiu B. says:

    July 15, 2008 at 9:50 pm

    @Wrong info!!2: The numbers came from an internal BMW document and we did not made them up. Now, I agree that BMW might have been a little conservative when it comes to the competition’s numbers, but from what I know, they do tend to test all the cars, including the competitors’, thoroughly, so they might be true. Also, this was an internal document, so not a marketing scheme.

    Reply
14. BMW Time - Kult marki BMW » Archiwum bloga » BMW nie gorsze niż Porsche says:

    August 18, 2008 at 5:07 am

    [...] Konkretnie chodzi o BMW X6 xDrive50i (oraz Cayenne GTS). Dominacja dokonana z mniejszego silnika o większej jednak mocy niż Porsche. Również porównując BMW X6 xDrive35i z Porsche Cayenne (3.6) bawarski samochód biję na głowę … [...]

    Reply
15. carlo cruz says:

    October 15, 2008 at 1:21 am

    both the bmw x6 and the cayenne are both road bred vehicles no question abt that but in general only the RRS can live in both habitats so do the math guys., take a look at the bigger picture. functionality wins.

    Reply
16. biggie says:

    March 5, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    this information is bullsh*t. the X6 cant go off road so it dosent count as an off-road SUV . got somthing to say …?? wittle baby wanna cry ??

    so you can go —- yourself and i know that range rover is da best .

    and please dont put FALSE INFORMATION on the internet , put it in your wittle play book ok

    Reply
17. tom says:

    July 14, 2009 at 6:44 pm

    this is the worst review i have seen in my life, everything is completly wrong for a 2008 article. The porsche cayenne actually does 0-60 in 7.5s and since 2008 when it says the article was produced they inroduced a diesel.

    Reply
18. spencer says:

    September 12, 2009 at 1:05 am

    ok first of call, your comparing bmw X6 to the base model of the porsche cayenne, and the range rover sport. I would like to see bmw X6 go up againts the porsche cayenne turbo S and the range rover supercharged.

    Reply